SLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC plc has a net margin of 8.68% compared to SLB Ltd.'s net margin of 11.77%. SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49% beat TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34%.

SLB Ltd. has a consensus price target of $45.99, signalling upside risk potential of 19.82%. On the other hand TechnipFMC plc has an analysts' consensus of $46.70 which suggests that it could grow by 4.8%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than TechnipFMC plc.

SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.658%.

SLB Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. TechnipFMC plc offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. SLB Ltd. pays 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC plc pays out 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.9B, which are larger than TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues of $2.6B. SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M is higher than TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M. Notably, SLB Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while TechnipFMC plc's PE ratio is 19.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLB Ltd. is 1.54x versus 1.94x for TechnipFMC plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of 8.68% compared to SLB Ltd.'s net margin of 0.36%. SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

SLB Ltd. has a consensus price target of $45.99, signalling upside risk potential of 19.82%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $31.21 which suggests that it could grow by 10.43%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.851%.

SLB Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. SLB Ltd. pays 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.9B, which are larger than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M is higher than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M. Notably, SLB Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 18.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLB Ltd. is 1.54x versus 1.10x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 8.68% compared to SLB Ltd.'s net margin of 4.55%. SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49% beat Liberty Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.28%.

SLB Ltd. has a consensus price target of $45.99, signalling upside risk potential of 19.82%. On the other hand Liberty Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.36 which suggests that it could grow by 4.86%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than Liberty Energy, Inc., analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than Liberty Energy, Inc..

SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.675%.

SLB Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Liberty Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. SLB Ltd. pays 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy, Inc. pays out 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.9B, which are larger than Liberty Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $947.4M. SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M is higher than Liberty Energy, Inc.'s net income of $43.1M. Notably, SLB Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while Liberty Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLB Ltd. is 1.54x versus 0.78x for Liberty Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a net margin of 8.68% compared to SLB Ltd.'s net margin of 0.93%. SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49% beat Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.47%.

SLB Ltd. has a consensus price target of $45.99, signalling upside risk potential of 19.82%. On the other hand Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.18%. Given that Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than SLB Ltd., analysts believe Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than SLB Ltd..

SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.148, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.25%.

SLB Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Ranger Energy Services, Inc. offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. SLB Ltd. pays 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Ranger Energy Services, Inc. pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.9B, which are larger than Ranger Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $128.9M. SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M is higher than Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M. Notably, SLB Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLB Ltd. is 1.54x versus 0.58x for Ranger Energy Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.