SLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 10.96%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $52.68, signalling upside risk potential of 25.86%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $34.16 which suggests that it could grow by 36.24%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.903%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is higher than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.47x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.66x versus 0.96x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 16.73%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $52.68, signalling upside risk potential of 25.86%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.35 which suggests that it could grow by 6.99%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.412%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is higher than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.47x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.66x versus 4.17x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Martin Midstream Partners LP has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of -5.22%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Martin Midstream Partners LP's return on equity of --.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $52.68, signalling upside risk potential of 25.86%. On the other hand Martin Midstream Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.36%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Martin Midstream Partners LP, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Martin Midstream Partners LP.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Martin Midstream Partners LP has a beta of 2.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.957%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Martin Midstream Partners LP offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Martin Midstream Partners LP pays out -15.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Martin Midstream Partners LP quarterly revenues of $171.3M. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is higher than Martin Midstream Partners LP's net income of -$8.9M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.47x while Martin Midstream Partners LP's PE ratio is 32.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.66x versus 0.20x for Martin Midstream Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 7.97%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 29.27%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $52.68, signalling upside risk potential of 25.86%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $217.85 which suggests that it could grow by 10.12%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Targa Resources.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 2.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.004%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 46.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is higher than Targa Resources's net income of $351M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.47x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 34.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.66x versus 2.67x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.