BKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of 12.01% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 10.41%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 14.67% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $57.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.9%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $35.58 which suggests that it could grow by 6.14%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes Co., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Baker Hughes Co..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.851%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 35.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $887M is higher than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 22.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 2.01x versus 1.29x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of 12.01% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 8.22%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 14.67% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.52%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $57.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.9%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $53.40 which suggests that it could grow by 10.38%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes Co., analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than Baker Hughes Co..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.18%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 35.39% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 48.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $887M is higher than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $800M. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 20.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 2.01x versus 1.95x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weatherford International plc has a net margin of 12.01% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 7.06%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 14.67% beat Weatherford International plc's return on equity of 31.19%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $57.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.9%. On the other hand Weatherford International plc has an analysts' consensus of $95.95 which suggests that it could grow by 1.99%. Given that Baker Hughes Co. has higher upside potential than Weatherford International plc, analysts believe Baker Hughes Co. is more attractive than Weatherford International plc.

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weatherford International plc has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.424%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Weatherford International plc offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 35.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Weatherford International plc pays out 7.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Weatherford International plc quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $887M is higher than Weatherford International plc's net income of $87M. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while Weatherford International plc's PE ratio is 16.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 2.01x versus 1.38x for Weatherford International plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a net margin of 12.01% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 8.26%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 14.67% beat Exxon Mobil Corp.'s return on equity of 11.06%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $57.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.9%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $134.57 which suggests that it could fall by -4.83%. Given that Baker Hughes Co. has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil Corp., analysts believe Baker Hughes Co. is more attractive than Exxon Mobil Corp..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil Corp. has a beta of 0.371, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.905%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Exxon Mobil Corp. offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 35.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil Corp. pays out 59.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil Corp. quarterly revenues of $80B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $887M is lower than Exxon Mobil Corp.'s net income of $6.6B. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while Exxon Mobil Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 2.01x versus 1.88x for Exxon Mobil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.