BKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of 12.01% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 10.41%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 14.67% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $60.45, signalling downside risk potential of -3.37%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $36.22 which suggests that it could grow by 2.4%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes Co., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Baker Hughes Co..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.896%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $887M is higher than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.02x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 23.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 2.24x versus 1.36x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a net margin of 12.01% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 26.57%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 14.67% beat Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.78%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $60.45, signalling downside risk potential of -3.37%. On the other hand Oceaneering International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.50 which suggests that it could fall by -32.28%. Given that Oceaneering International, Inc. has more downside risk than Baker Hughes Co., analysts believe Baker Hughes Co. is more attractive than Oceaneering International, Inc..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International, Inc. has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.631%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Oceaneering International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Oceaneering International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $668.6M. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $887M is higher than Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net income of $177.7M. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.02x while Oceaneering International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 2.24x versus 1.32x for Oceaneering International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of 12.01% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 8.22%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 14.67% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.52%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $60.45, signalling downside risk potential of -3.37%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $55.30 which suggests that it could grow by 6.8%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes Co., analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than Baker Hughes Co..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.443%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 48.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $887M is higher than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $800M. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.02x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 2.24x versus 2.07x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a net margin of 12.01% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 8.26%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 14.67% beat Exxon Mobil Corp.'s return on equity of 11.06%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $60.45, signalling downside risk potential of -3.37%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $140.92 which suggests that it could fall by -6.66%. Given that Exxon Mobil Corp. has more downside risk than Baker Hughes Co., analysts believe Baker Hughes Co. is more attractive than Exxon Mobil Corp..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil Corp. has a beta of 0.388, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.193%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Exxon Mobil Corp. offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil Corp. pays out 59.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil Corp. quarterly revenues of $80B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $887M is lower than Exxon Mobil Corp.'s net income of $6.6B. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.02x while Exxon Mobil Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 2.24x versus 2.01x for Exxon Mobil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.