BKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of 8.8% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 0.36%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 16.86% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $53.14, signalling upside risk potential of 6.35%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $31.72 which suggests that it could fall by -2.79%. Given that Baker Hughes Co. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Baker Hughes Co. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.851%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 28.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $617M is higher than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.21x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 21.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 1.79x versus 1.27x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of 8.8% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 8.68%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 16.86% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $53.14, signalling upside risk potential of 6.35%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $47.30 which suggests that it could grow by 6.45%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes Co., analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than Baker Hughes Co..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.18%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 28.23% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $8.9B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $617M is lower than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.21x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 1.79x versus 1.78x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weatherford International plc has a net margin of 8.8% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 7.06%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 16.86% beat Weatherford International plc's return on equity of 31.19%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $53.14, signalling upside risk potential of 6.35%. On the other hand Weatherford International plc has an analysts' consensus of $89.45 which suggests that it could grow by 0.27%. Given that Baker Hughes Co. has higher upside potential than Weatherford International plc, analysts believe Baker Hughes Co. is more attractive than Weatherford International plc.

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weatherford International plc has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.424%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Weatherford International plc offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 28.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Weatherford International plc pays out 7.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Weatherford International plc quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $617M is higher than Weatherford International plc's net income of $87M. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.21x while Weatherford International plc's PE ratio is 16.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 1.79x versus 1.31x for Weatherford International plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a net margin of 8.8% compared to Baker Hughes Co.'s net margin of 9.32%. Baker Hughes Co.'s return on equity of 16.86% beat Exxon Mobil Corp.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a consensus price target of $53.14, signalling upside risk potential of 6.35%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $131.44 which suggests that it could grow by 6.94%. Given that Exxon Mobil Corp. has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes Co., analysts believe Exxon Mobil Corp. is more attractive than Baker Hughes Co..

Baker Hughes Co. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil Corp. has a beta of 0.371, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.905%.

Baker Hughes Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Exxon Mobil Corp. offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Baker Hughes Co. pays 28.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil Corp. pays out 49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes Co. quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.4B. Baker Hughes Co.'s net income of $617M is lower than Exxon Mobil Corp.'s net income of $7.8B. Notably, Baker Hughes Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.21x while Exxon Mobil Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes Co. is 1.79x versus 1.65x for Exxon Mobil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.