OII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC plc has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net margin of 11.77%. Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.28% beat TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34%.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.25, signalling downside risk potential of -10.98%. On the other hand TechnipFMC plc has an analysts' consensus of $45.75 which suggests that it could fall by -1.63%. Given that Oceaneering International, Inc. has more downside risk than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe TechnipFMC plc is more attractive than Oceaneering International, Inc..

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.254%.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TechnipFMC plc offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oceaneering International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC plc pays out 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $742.9M, which are smaller than TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net income of $71.3M is lower than TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M. Notably, Oceaneering International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while TechnipFMC plc's PE ratio is 20.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International, Inc. is 0.98x versus 2.02x for TechnipFMC plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net margin of 0.36%. Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.28% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.25, signalling downside risk potential of -10.98%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $30.29 which suggests that it could grow by 8.85%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, Inc., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Oceaneering International, Inc..

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.59%.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Oceaneering International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $742.9M, which are smaller than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net income of $71.3M is higher than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M. Notably, Oceaneering International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 18.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International, Inc. is 0.98x versus 1.08x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net margin of 4.55%. Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.28% beat Liberty Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.28%.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.25, signalling downside risk potential of -10.98%. On the other hand Liberty Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.49%. Given that Oceaneering International, Inc. has more downside risk than Liberty Energy, Inc., analysts believe Liberty Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Oceaneering International, Inc..

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.647%.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liberty Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Oceaneering International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy, Inc. pays out 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $742.9M, which are smaller than Liberty Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $947.4M. Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net income of $71.3M is higher than Liberty Energy, Inc.'s net income of $43.1M. Notably, Oceaneering International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while Liberty Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International, Inc. is 0.98x versus 0.83x for Liberty Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

USA Compression Partners LP has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net margin of 13.78%. Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.28% beat USA Compression Partners LP's return on equity of 342.37%.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.25, signalling downside risk potential of -10.98%. On the other hand USA Compression Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $26.83 which suggests that it could grow by 9.61%. Given that USA Compression Partners LP has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, Inc., analysts believe USA Compression Partners LP is more attractive than Oceaneering International, Inc..

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison USA Compression Partners LP has a beta of 0.250, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.986%.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. USA Compression Partners LP offers a yield of 8.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Oceaneering International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. USA Compression Partners LP pays out 293.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $742.9M, which are larger than USA Compression Partners LP quarterly revenues of $250.3M. Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net income of $71.3M is higher than USA Compression Partners LP's net income of $34.5M. Notably, Oceaneering International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while USA Compression Partners LP's PE ratio is 30.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International, Inc. is 0.98x versus 2.96x for USA Compression Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.