Financhill
Sell
48

WTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.37
Seasonality move :
-3.32%
Day range:
$1.35 - $1.41
52-week range:
$1.09 - $2.84
Dividend yield:
2.92%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.39x
P/B ratio:
67.34x
Volume:
1.8M
Avg. volume:
1.5M
1-year change:
-42.44%
Market cap:
$202.3M
Revenue:
$525.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.72

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
WTI
W&T Offshore
$123.9M -$0.15 -8.03% -20% $10.00
AMPY
Amplify Energy
$73.9M $0.16 -1.38% -75.47% $10.25
AROC
Archrock
$342.5M $0.39 33.21% 68.18% $30.88
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$3.8B $4.20 36.08% -36.18% $183.20
MTDR
Matador Resources
$956.6M $1.78 5.96% -22.93% $63.44
RRC
Range Resources
$784.1M $0.93 37.08% 520.28% $39.90
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
WTI
W&T Offshore
$1.37 $10.00 $202.3M -- $0.01 2.92% 0.39x
AMPY
Amplify Energy
$2.89 $10.25 $116.6M 10.32x $0.00 0% 0.39x
AROC
Archrock
$24.70 $30.88 $4.4B 20.93x $0.19 2.92% 3.34x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$137.89 $183.20 $40.3B 8.43x $1.00 3.73% 2.59x
MTDR
Matador Resources
$42.75 $63.44 $5.4B 5.74x $0.31 2.52% 1.45x
RRC
Range Resources
$37.86 $39.90 $9B 33.80x $0.09 0.87% 3.54x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
WTI
W&T Offshore
130.98% 0.392 152.96% 1.05x
AMPY
Amplify Energy
23.7% 1.731 53.19% 0.58x
AROC
Archrock
62.99% 2.035 49.89% 0.92x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
26.55% 0.334 28.27% 0.72x
MTDR
Matador Resources
37.53% 1.136 47.04% 0.58x
RRC
Range Resources
30.1% 0.467 17.71% 0.53x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
WTI
W&T Offshore
$91.3M -$8.2M -29.88% -579.3% -19.79% -$10.4M
AMPY
Amplify Energy
$21M $4M 2.51% 3.26% -9.8% -$5.8M
AROC
Archrock
$164.5M $127.3M 7.53% 17.64% 37.37% -$52.5M
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$1.8B $1.7B 9.23% 12.66% 47.98% $663M
MTDR
Matador Resources
$416.8M $381.4M 11.72% 18.13% 39.22% $194M
RRC
Range Resources
$366.1M $311M 4.84% 6.98% 16.41% $172.5M

W&T Offshore vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns WTI or AMPY?

    Amplify Energy has a net margin of -23.55% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of -10.76%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3% beat Amplify Energy's return on equity of 3.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    70.32% -$0.21 $267.3M
    AMPY
    Amplify Energy
    30.48% -$0.19 $535.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About WTI or AMPY?

    W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 629.93%. On the other hand Amplify Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.25 which suggests that it could grow by 254.67%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Amplify Energy, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Amplify Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0 0 0
    AMPY
    Amplify Energy
    1 0 0
  • Is WTI or AMPY More Risky?

    W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Energy has a beta of 0.368, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.175%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTI or AMPY?

    W&T Offshore has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Amplify Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W&T Offshore pays -6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WTI or AMPY?

    W&T Offshore quarterly revenues are $129.9M, which are larger than Amplify Energy quarterly revenues of $69M. W&T Offshore's net income of -$30.6M is lower than Amplify Energy's net income of -$7.4M. Notably, W&T Offshore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Energy's PE ratio is 10.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W&T Offshore is 0.39x versus 0.39x for Amplify Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0.39x -- $129.9M -$30.6M
    AMPY
    Amplify Energy
    0.39x 10.32x $69M -$7.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns WTI or AROC?

    Archrock has a net margin of -23.55% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of 20.41%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3% beat Archrock's return on equity of 17.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    70.32% -$0.21 $267.3M
    AROC
    Archrock
    47.38% $0.40 $3.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About WTI or AROC?

    W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 629.93%. On the other hand Archrock has an analysts' consensus of $30.88 which suggests that it could grow by 25%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Archrock, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Archrock.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0 0 0
    AROC
    Archrock
    4 0 0
  • Is WTI or AROC More Risky?

    W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archrock has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.266%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTI or AROC?

    W&T Offshore has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Archrock offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. W&T Offshore pays -6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock pays out 64.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WTI or AROC?

    W&T Offshore quarterly revenues are $129.9M, which are smaller than Archrock quarterly revenues of $347.2M. W&T Offshore's net income of -$30.6M is lower than Archrock's net income of $70.9M. Notably, W&T Offshore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Archrock's PE ratio is 20.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W&T Offshore is 0.39x versus 3.34x for Archrock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0.39x -- $129.9M -$30.6M
    AROC
    Archrock
    3.34x 20.93x $347.2M $70.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns WTI or FANG?

    Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -23.55% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of 34.86%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    70.32% -$0.21 $267.3M
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    45% $4.83 $55.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About WTI or FANG?

    W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 629.93%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $183.20 which suggests that it could grow by 32.86%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0 0 0
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    16 3 0
  • Is WTI or FANG More Risky?

    W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTI or FANG?

    W&T Offshore has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. W&T Offshore pays -6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WTI or FANG?

    W&T Offshore quarterly revenues are $129.9M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. W&T Offshore's net income of -$30.6M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, W&T Offshore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W&T Offshore is 0.39x versus 2.59x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0.39x -- $129.9M -$30.6M
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.59x 8.43x $4B $1.4B
  • Which has Higher Returns WTI or MTDR?

    Matador Resources has a net margin of -23.55% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of 23.86%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    70.32% -$0.21 $267.3M
    MTDR
    Matador Resources
    41.43% $1.92 $8.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About WTI or MTDR?

    W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 629.93%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $63.44 which suggests that it could grow by 48.39%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Matador Resources, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Matador Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0 0 0
    MTDR
    Matador Resources
    10 2 0
  • Is WTI or MTDR More Risky?

    W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.147%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTI or MTDR?

    W&T Offshore has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. W&T Offshore pays -6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WTI or MTDR?

    W&T Offshore quarterly revenues are $129.9M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $1B. W&T Offshore's net income of -$30.6M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $240.1M. Notably, W&T Offshore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 5.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W&T Offshore is 0.39x versus 1.45x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0.39x -- $129.9M -$30.6M
    MTDR
    Matador Resources
    1.45x 5.74x $1B $240.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns WTI or RRC?

    Range Resources has a net margin of -23.55% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of 11.47%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    70.32% -$0.21 $267.3M
    RRC
    Range Resources
    43.26% $0.40 $5.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About WTI or RRC?

    W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 629.93%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $39.90 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Range Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0 0 0
    RRC
    Range Resources
    7 15 0
  • Is WTI or RRC More Risky?

    W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 0.597, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.255%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WTI or RRC?

    W&T Offshore has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. W&T Offshore pays -6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WTI or RRC?

    W&T Offshore quarterly revenues are $129.9M, which are smaller than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $846.3M. W&T Offshore's net income of -$30.6M is lower than Range Resources's net income of $97.1M. Notably, W&T Offshore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Range Resources's PE ratio is 33.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W&T Offshore is 0.39x versus 3.54x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0.39x -- $129.9M -$30.6M
    RRC
    Range Resources
    3.54x 33.80x $846.3M $97.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now

The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…

Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?

Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…

Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?

Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.

Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10

Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.

Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10

Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock