WFRD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands has a net margin of 11.14% compared to Weatherford International PLC's net margin of 31.6%. Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62% beat CKX Lands's return on equity of 2.51%.

Weatherford International PLC has a consensus price target of $111.56, signalling upside risk potential of 66.33%. On the other hand CKX Lands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than CKX Lands.

Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands has a beta of 0.014, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.63%.

Weatherford International PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. CKX Lands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Weatherford International PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than CKX Lands quarterly revenues of $171.3K. Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M is higher than CKX Lands's net income of $54.1K. Notably, Weatherford International PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.42x while CKX Lands's PE ratio is 58.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Weatherford International PLC is 0.91x versus 12.98x for CKX Lands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 11.14% compared to Weatherford International PLC's net margin of 10.02%. Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15%.

Weatherford International PLC has a consensus price target of $111.56, signalling upside risk potential of 66.33%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $37.23 which suggests that it could grow by 43.36%. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than Halliburton.

Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.903, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.341%.

Weatherford International PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Weatherford International PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $571M. Notably, Weatherford International PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.42x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Weatherford International PLC is 0.91x versus 1.00x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of 11.14% compared to Weatherford International PLC's net margin of -4.34%. Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -205.53%.

Weatherford International PLC has a consensus price target of $111.56, signalling upside risk potential of 66.33%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 124.72%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than Weatherford International PLC, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than Weatherford International PLC.

Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 2.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.046%.

Weatherford International PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Weatherford International PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.9M. Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M is higher than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Weatherford International PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.42x while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Weatherford International PLC is 0.91x versus 0.10x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 11.14% compared to Weatherford International PLC's net margin of 12.95%. Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73%.

Weatherford International PLC has a consensus price target of $111.56, signalling upside risk potential of 66.33%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $56.17 which suggests that it could grow by 52.6%. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.506%.

Weatherford International PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Weatherford International PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Weatherford International PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.42x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 11.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Weatherford International PLC is 0.91x versus 1.48x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.