PSX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 6.7%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 7% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $138.97, signalling upside risk potential of 8.22%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $176.76 which suggests that it could grow by 9.92%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.132%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $33.7B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.3B. Phillips 66's net income of $8M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.99x while Chevron's PE ratio is 16.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.38x versus 1.51x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 1.12%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 7% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $138.97, signalling upside risk potential of 8.22%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $166.26 which suggests that it could grow by 13.88%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.425%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $33.7B, which are larger than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $33.1B. Phillips 66's net income of $8M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.99x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 14.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.38x versus 0.36x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 0.91%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 7% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $138.97, signalling upside risk potential of 8.22%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.16 which suggests that it could grow by 12.97%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.365%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $33.7B, which are larger than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.8B. Phillips 66's net income of $8M is lower than Valero Energy's net income of $281M. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.99x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 15.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.38x versus 0.33x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 9.39%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 7% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $138.97, signalling upside risk potential of 8.22%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $129.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.58%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.351%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $33.7B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Phillips 66's net income of $8M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.99x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.38x versus 1.42x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.