PSX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 7.49%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Chevron Corp.'s return on equity of 8.03%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $149.25, signalling upside risk potential of 6.62%. On the other hand Chevron Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $172.79 which suggests that it could grow by 13.49%. Given that Chevron Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Chevron Corp. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron Corp. has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.749%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Chevron Corp. offers a yield of 4.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron Corp. pays out 67.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are smaller than Chevron Corp. quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Chevron Corp.'s net income of $3.6B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.10x while Chevron Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.43x versus 1.46x for Chevron Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 5.6%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 19.43%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $149.25, signalling upside risk potential of 6.62%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $201.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.88%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum Corp., analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum Corp..

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.912%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.10x while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.43x versus 0.45x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 3.3%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.27%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $149.25, signalling upside risk potential of 6.62%. On the other hand Valero Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $185.83 which suggests that it could grow by 4.96%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.442%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Valero Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy Corp. pays out 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are larger than Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $32.2B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.10x while Valero Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.43x versus 0.45x for Valero Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 9.32%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Exxon Mobil Corp.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $149.25, signalling upside risk potential of 6.62%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $128.92 which suggests that it could grow by 9.44%. Given that Exxon Mobil Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Exxon Mobil Corp. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil Corp. has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.639%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Exxon Mobil Corp. offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil Corp. pays out 49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.4B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Exxon Mobil Corp.'s net income of $7.8B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.10x while Exxon Mobil Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.43x versus 1.58x for Exxon Mobil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.