PSX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 7.49%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Chevron Corp.'s return on equity of 8.03%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $148.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Chevron Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $172.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.51%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Chevron Corp., analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Chevron Corp..

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron Corp. has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.749%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Chevron Corp. offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron Corp. pays out 67.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are smaller than Chevron Corp. quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Chevron Corp.'s net income of $3.6B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.09x while Chevron Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.40x versus 1.45x for Chevron Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 5.6%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 19.43%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $148.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $200.67 which suggests that it could grow by 21.08%. Given that Marathon Petroleum Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.912%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.09x while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.40x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 3.3%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.27%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $148.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Valero Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $184.94 which suggests that it could grow by 12.45%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.442%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Valero Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy Corp. pays out 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are larger than Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $32.2B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.09x while Valero Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 34.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.40x versus 0.42x for Valero Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 9.32%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Exxon Mobil Corp.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $148.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $131.56 which suggests that it could grow by 10.35%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil Corp., analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Exxon Mobil Corp..

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil Corp. has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.639%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Exxon Mobil Corp. offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil Corp. pays out 49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.4B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Exxon Mobil Corp.'s net income of $7.8B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.09x while Exxon Mobil Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.40x versus 1.60x for Exxon Mobil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.