PSX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 5.6%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 19.43%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $151.45, signalling upside risk potential of 5.5%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $194.83 which suggests that it could grow by 10.58%. Given that Marathon Petroleum Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.575%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.23x while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.45x versus 0.41x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 13.05%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.34%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $151.45, signalling upside risk potential of 5.5%. On the other hand Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.56%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.762%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are larger than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $262.6M. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.23x while Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.45x versus 0.27x for Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 2.24%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat PBF Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.67%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $151.45, signalling upside risk potential of 5.5%. On the other hand PBF Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $31.92 which suggests that it could fall by -4.59%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, Inc., analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than PBF Energy, Inc..

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.503, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.688%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. PBF Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy, Inc. pays out 22.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are larger than PBF Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than PBF Energy, Inc.'s net income of $171.7M. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.23x while PBF Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.45x versus 0.13x for PBF Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy Corp. has a net margin of 0.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 3.85%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65% beat Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $151.45, signalling upside risk potential of 5.5%. On the other hand Valero Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $196.12 which suggests that it could grow by 6.15%. Given that Valero Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Valero Energy Corp. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.613%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Valero Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Phillips 66 pays 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy Corp. pays out 59.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $34.5B, which are larger than Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Phillips 66's net income of $165M is lower than Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.23x while Valero Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.45x versus 0.46x for Valero Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.