PPG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 10.73% compared to PPG Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 7.99%. PPG Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.06% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $119.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.92%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $177.46 which suggests that it could grow by 7%. Given that PPG Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nucor Corp., analysts believe PPG Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Nucor Corp..

PPG Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.855, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.522%.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. PPG Industries, Inc. pays 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 25.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPG Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. PPG Industries, Inc.'s net income of $438M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $681M. Notably, PPG Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.48x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPG Industries, Inc. is 1.51x versus 1.20x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RPM International, Inc. has a net margin of 10.73% compared to PPG Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 10.74%. PPG Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.06% beat RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.55%.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $119.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.92%. On the other hand RPM International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $130.71 which suggests that it could grow by 23.56%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than PPG Industries, Inc., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than PPG Industries, Inc..

PPG Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.934%.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. RPM International, Inc. offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. PPG Industries, Inc. pays 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International, Inc. pays out 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPG Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. PPG Industries, Inc.'s net income of $438M is higher than RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $227M. Notably, PPG Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.48x while RPM International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPG Industries, Inc. is 1.51x versus 1.80x for RPM International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a net margin of 10.73% compared to PPG Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 13.1%. PPG Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.06% beat The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 60.76%.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $119.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.92%. On the other hand The Sherwin-Williams Co. has an analysts' consensus of $385.95 which suggests that it could grow by 18.63%. Given that The Sherwin-Williams Co. has higher upside potential than PPG Industries, Inc., analysts believe The Sherwin-Williams Co. is more attractive than PPG Industries, Inc..

PPG Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.127%.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. The Sherwin-Williams Co. offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. PPG Industries, Inc. pays 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays out 27.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPG Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. PPG Industries, Inc.'s net income of $438M is lower than The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $833.1M. Notably, PPG Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.48x while The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s PE ratio is 31.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPG Industries, Inc. is 1.51x versus 3.52x for The Sherwin-Williams Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of 10.73% compared to PPG Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 8.37%. PPG Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.06% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68%.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $119.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.92%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $180.78 which suggests that it could grow by 3.08%. Given that PPG Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe PPG Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

PPG Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.52%.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. PPG Industries, Inc. pays 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPG Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.8B. PPG Industries, Inc.'s net income of $438M is higher than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M. Notably, PPG Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.48x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPG Industries, Inc. is 1.51x versus 1.49x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.