RPM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PPG Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 8.42% compared to RPM International, Inc.'s net margin of 7.95%. RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98% beat PPG Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.96%.

RPM International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.36, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand PPG Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $125.30 which suggests that it could fall by -0.97%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than PPG Industries, Inc., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than PPG Industries, Inc..

RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.922% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPG Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.597%.

RPM International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. PPG Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. RPM International, Inc. pays 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. PPG Industries, Inc. pays out 40.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than PPG Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $160.8M is lower than PPG Industries, Inc.'s net income of $311M. Notably, RPM International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while PPG Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International, Inc. is 1.95x versus 1.81x for PPG Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance, Inc. has a net margin of 8.42% compared to RPM International, Inc.'s net margin of 3.34%. RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98% beat Reliance, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.28%.

RPM International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.36, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Reliance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $329.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.29%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Reliance, Inc., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than Reliance, Inc..

RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.922% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance, Inc. has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.191%.

RPM International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Reliance, Inc. offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. RPM International, Inc. pays 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance, Inc. pays out 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Reliance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $160.8M is higher than Reliance, Inc.'s net income of $116.9M. Notably, RPM International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Reliance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International, Inc. is 1.95x versus 1.18x for Reliance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a net margin of 8.42% compared to RPM International, Inc.'s net margin of 8.52%. RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98% beat The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 59.44%.

RPM International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.36, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand The Sherwin-Williams Co. has an analysts' consensus of $387.43 which suggests that it could grow by 7.43%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Sherwin-Williams Co., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than The Sherwin-Williams Co..

RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.922% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.358%.

RPM International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. The Sherwin-Williams Co. offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. RPM International, Inc. pays 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays out 30.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $160.8M is lower than The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $476.8M. Notably, RPM International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s PE ratio is 35.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International, Inc. is 1.95x versus 3.83x for The Sherwin-Williams Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of 8.42% compared to RPM International, Inc.'s net margin of 5.99%. RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33%.

RPM International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.36, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $193.10 which suggests that it could fall by -0.15%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.922% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.217%.

RPM International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. RPM International, Inc. pays 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $160.8M is lower than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M. Notably, RPM International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International, Inc. is 1.95x versus 1.58x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.