RPM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

H.B. Fuller Co. has a net margin of 10.74% compared to RPM International, Inc.'s net margin of 7.54%. RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.55% beat H.B. Fuller Co.'s return on equity of 6.2%.

RPM International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $132.29, signalling upside risk potential of 24.89%. On the other hand H.B. Fuller Co. has an analysts' consensus of $68.57 which suggests that it could grow by 16.38%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller Co., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than H.B. Fuller Co..

RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, which suggesting that the stock is 10.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H.B. Fuller Co. has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.407%.

RPM International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. H.B. Fuller Co. offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. RPM International, Inc. pays 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller Co. pays out 37.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than H.B. Fuller Co. quarterly revenues of $892M. RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than H.B. Fuller Co.'s net income of $67.2M. Notably, RPM International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.77x while H.B. Fuller Co.'s PE ratio is 28.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International, Inc. is 1.80x versus 0.93x for H.B. Fuller Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 10.74% compared to RPM International, Inc.'s net margin of 10.73%. RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.55% beat PPG Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.06%.

RPM International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $132.29, signalling upside risk potential of 24.89%. On the other hand PPG Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $119.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.92%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than PPG Industries, Inc., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than PPG Industries, Inc..

RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, which suggesting that the stock is 10.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPG Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.534%.

RPM International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. PPG Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. RPM International, Inc. pays 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. PPG Industries, Inc. pays out 44.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than PPG Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $227M is lower than PPG Industries, Inc.'s net income of $438M. Notably, RPM International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.77x while PPG Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International, Inc. is 1.80x versus 1.48x for PPG Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 10.74% compared to RPM International, Inc.'s net margin of -28.74%. RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.55% beat Perimeter Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.89%.

RPM International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $132.29, signalling upside risk potential of 24.89%. On the other hand Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $31.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.4%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Perimeter Solutions, Inc., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than Perimeter Solutions, Inc..

RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, which suggesting that the stock is 10.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perimeter Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RPM International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Perimeter Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RPM International, Inc. pays 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Perimeter Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Perimeter Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $315.4M. RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than Perimeter Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$90.7M. Notably, RPM International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.77x while Perimeter Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International, Inc. is 1.80x versus 6.63x for Perimeter Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a net margin of 10.74% compared to RPM International, Inc.'s net margin of 13.1%. RPM International, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.55% beat The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 60.76%.

RPM International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $132.29, signalling upside risk potential of 24.89%. On the other hand The Sherwin-Williams Co. has an analysts' consensus of $385.81 which suggests that it could grow by 13.73%. Given that RPM International, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Sherwin-Williams Co., analysts believe RPM International, Inc. is more attractive than The Sherwin-Williams Co..

RPM International, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, which suggesting that the stock is 10.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.127%.

RPM International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. The Sherwin-Williams Co. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. RPM International, Inc. pays 37.19% of its earnings as a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays out 27.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. RPM International, Inc.'s net income of $227M is lower than The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $833.1M. Notably, RPM International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.77x while The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s PE ratio is 33.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International, Inc. is 1.80x versus 3.67x for The Sherwin-Williams Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.