MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C3.ai has a net margin of 34.62% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -81.19%. Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34% beat C3.ai's return on equity of -32.29%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $506.24, signalling upside risk potential of 33.64%. On the other hand C3.ai has an analysts' consensus of $31.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.13%. Given that C3.ai has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe C3.ai is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. C3.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. C3.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $69.6B, which are larger than C3.ai quarterly revenues of $98.8M. Microsoft's net income of $24.1B is higher than C3.ai's net income of -$80.2M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.50x while C3.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 10.81x versus 7.52x for C3.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salesforce has a net margin of 34.62% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 17.09%. Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $506.24, signalling upside risk potential of 33.64%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $375.36 which suggests that it could grow by 39.04%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.323%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $69.6B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Microsoft's net income of $24.1B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.50x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 42.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 10.81x versus 6.94x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 34.62% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -33.19%. Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -32.41%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $506.24, signalling upside risk potential of 33.64%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $206.08 which suggests that it could grow by 36.82%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $69.6B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $986.8M. Microsoft's net income of $24.1B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$327.5M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.50x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 10.81x versus 13.82x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 34.62% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 57.56%. Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 63.2%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $506.24, signalling upside risk potential of 33.64%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $89.20 which suggests that it could grow by 22.62%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.391, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.134%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $69.6B, which are larger than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $12B. Microsoft's net income of $24.1B is higher than Uber Technologies's net income of $6.9B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.50x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 15.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 10.81x versus 3.53x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.