MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 35.72% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of 21.45%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4% beat Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.9%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $625.41, signalling upside risk potential of 30.91%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $384.20 which suggests that it could grow by 14.31%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems, Inc..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.072, which suggesting that the stock is 7.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.176%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $77.7B, which are larger than Cadence Design Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B is higher than Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s net income of $287.1M. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.99x while Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 86.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 12.14x versus 17.65x for Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy, Inc. has a net margin of 35.72% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of -3797.18%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4% beat Strategy, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $625.41, signalling upside risk potential of 30.91%. On the other hand Strategy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $517.21 which suggests that it could grow by 174.55%. Given that Strategy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Microsoft Corp., analysts believe Strategy, Inc. is more attractive than Microsoft Corp..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.072, which suggesting that the stock is 7.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy, Inc. has a beta of 3.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 239.712%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Strategy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $77.7B, which are larger than Strategy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $128.7M. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B is higher than Strategy, Inc.'s net income of $2.8B. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.99x while Strategy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 12.14x versus 109.10x for Strategy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Atlassian Corp. has a net margin of 35.72% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of -3.62%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4% beat Atlassian Corp.'s return on equity of -14.57%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $625.41, signalling upside risk potential of 30.91%. On the other hand Atlassian Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $245.24 which suggests that it could grow by 56.45%. Given that Atlassian Corp. has higher upside potential than Microsoft Corp., analysts believe Atlassian Corp. is more attractive than Microsoft Corp..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.072, which suggesting that the stock is 7.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlassian Corp. has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.538%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Atlassian Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlassian Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $77.7B, which are larger than Atlassian Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B is higher than Atlassian Corp.'s net income of -$51.9M. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.99x while Atlassian Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 12.14x versus 7.53x for Atlassian Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday, Inc. has a net margin of 35.72% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of 10.38%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4% beat Workday, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.19%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $625.41, signalling upside risk potential of 30.91%. On the other hand Workday, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $275.64 which suggests that it could grow by 28.3%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Workday, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Workday, Inc..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.072, which suggesting that the stock is 7.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday, Inc. has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.195%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Workday, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $77.7B, which are larger than Workday, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B is higher than Workday, Inc.'s net income of $252M. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.99x while Workday, Inc.'s PE ratio is 90.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 12.14x versus 6.30x for Workday, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.