MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk, Inc. has a net margin of 47.32% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of 18.5%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63% beat Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $596.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.04%. On the other hand Autodesk, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $354.11 which suggests that it could grow by 56.01%. Given that Autodesk, Inc. has higher upside potential than Microsoft Corp., analysts believe Autodesk, Inc. is more attractive than Microsoft Corp..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.621%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Autodesk, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $81.3B, which are larger than Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B is higher than Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.85x while Autodesk, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 9.70x versus 7.13x for Autodesk, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salesforce, Inc. has a net margin of 47.32% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of 20.33%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63% beat Salesforce, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.97%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $596.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.04%. On the other hand Salesforce, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $316.74 which suggests that it could grow by 71.32%. Given that Salesforce, Inc. has higher upside potential than Microsoft Corp., analysts believe Salesforce, Inc. is more attractive than Microsoft Corp..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce, Inc. has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.8%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Salesforce, Inc. offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce, Inc. pays out 25.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $81.3B, which are larger than Salesforce, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.3B. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B is higher than Salesforce, Inc.'s net income of $2.1B. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.85x while Salesforce, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 9.70x versus 4.43x for Salesforce, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit, Inc. has a net margin of 47.32% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of 11.48%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63% beat Intuit, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.62%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $596.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.04%. On the other hand Intuit, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $761.29 which suggests that it could grow by 100.05%. Given that Intuit, Inc. has higher upside potential than Microsoft Corp., analysts believe Intuit, Inc. is more attractive than Microsoft Corp..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit, Inc. has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.377%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Intuit, Inc. offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit, Inc. pays out 30.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $81.3B, which are larger than Intuit, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B is higher than Intuit, Inc.'s net income of $446M. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.85x while Intuit, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 9.70x versus 5.52x for Intuit, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy, Inc. has a net margin of 47.32% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of -10112%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63% beat Strategy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.11%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $596.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.04%. On the other hand Strategy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $394.38 which suggests that it could grow by 200.94%. Given that Strategy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Microsoft Corp., analysts believe Strategy, Inc. is more attractive than Microsoft Corp..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy, Inc. has a beta of 3.541, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.081%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Strategy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $81.3B, which are larger than Strategy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $123M. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B is higher than Strategy, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4B. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.85x while Strategy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 9.70x versus 80.50x for Strategy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.