MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 15.68%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $516.34, signalling upside risk potential of 7.1%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $353.19 which suggests that it could grow by 36.11%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.665%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.11x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 40.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 13.28x versus 6.52x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -9.99%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $516.34, signalling upside risk potential of 7.1%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $472.83 which suggests that it could fall by -2.54%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.225%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.11x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 13.28x versus 29.10x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 15.4%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $516.34, signalling upside risk potential of 7.1%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $96.54 which suggests that it could grow by 15.71%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.884%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.11x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 14.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 13.28x versus 3.94x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 3.04%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $516.34, signalling upside risk potential of 7.1%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $297.62 which suggests that it could grow by 25.64%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.596%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.11x while Workday's PE ratio is 130.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 13.28x versus 7.33x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.