MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk, Inc. has a net margin of 47.32% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of 16.1%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63% beat Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.46%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $594.62, signalling upside risk potential of 50.33%. On the other hand Autodesk, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $331.75 which suggests that it could grow by 32.08%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Autodesk, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Autodesk, Inc..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.045%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Autodesk, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $81.3B, which are larger than Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B is higher than Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $316M. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.75x while Autodesk, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 9.66x versus 7.50x for Autodesk, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salesforce, Inc. has a net margin of 47.32% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of 17.35%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63% beat Salesforce, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.33%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $594.62, signalling upside risk potential of 50.33%. On the other hand Salesforce, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $276.33 which suggests that it could grow by 43.3%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Salesforce, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Salesforce, Inc..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.749%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Salesforce, Inc. offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce, Inc. pays out 21.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $81.3B, which are larger than Salesforce, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.2B. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B is higher than Salesforce, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.75x while Salesforce, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 9.66x versus 4.44x for Salesforce, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit, Inc. has a net margin of 47.32% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of 14.9%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63% beat Intuit, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.57%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $594.62, signalling upside risk potential of 50.33%. On the other hand Intuit, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $606.43 which suggests that it could grow by 37.84%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Intuit, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Intuit, Inc..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit, Inc. has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.552%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Intuit, Inc. offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit, Inc. pays out 30.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $81.3B, which are larger than Intuit, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B is higher than Intuit, Inc.'s net income of $693M. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.75x while Intuit, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 9.66x versus 6.15x for Intuit, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy, Inc. has a net margin of 47.32% compared to Microsoft Corp.'s net margin of -10112%. Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63% beat Strategy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.11%.

Microsoft Corp. has a consensus price target of $594.62, signalling upside risk potential of 50.33%. On the other hand Strategy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $378.71 which suggests that it could grow by 171.15%. Given that Strategy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Microsoft Corp., analysts believe Strategy, Inc. is more attractive than Microsoft Corp..

Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy, Inc. has a beta of 3.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.657%.

Microsoft Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Strategy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft Corp. pays 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues are $81.3B, which are larger than Strategy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $123M. Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B is higher than Strategy, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4B. Notably, Microsoft Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.75x while Strategy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft Corp. is 9.66x versus 85.80x for Strategy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.