MAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro, Inc. has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Mattel, Inc.'s net margin of 14.05%. Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.98% beat Hasbro, Inc.'s return on equity of -43.57%.

Mattel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.45, signalling upside risk potential of 29.46%. On the other hand Hasbro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $107.85 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that Mattel, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hasbro, Inc., analysts believe Mattel, Inc. is more attractive than Hasbro, Inc..

Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.153%.

Mattel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hasbro, Inc. offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Mattel, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro, Inc. pays out 76.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Hasbro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $106.3M is lower than Hasbro, Inc.'s net income of $203.1M. Notably, Mattel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Hasbro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel, Inc. is 0.95x versus 3.19x for Hasbro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Mattel, Inc.'s net margin of 9.42%. Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.98% beat JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.49%.

Mattel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.45, signalling upside risk potential of 29.46%. On the other hand JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.50 which suggests that it could grow by 58.33%. Given that JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mattel, Inc., analysts believe JAKKS Pacific, Inc. is more attractive than Mattel, Inc..

Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.881%.

Mattel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. offers a yield of 5.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Mattel, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than JAKKS Pacific, Inc. quarterly revenues of $211.2M. Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $106.3M is higher than JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s net income of $19.9M. Notably, Mattel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel, Inc. is 0.95x versus 0.35x for JAKKS Pacific, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Playboy, Inc. has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Mattel, Inc.'s net margin of 1.59%. Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.98% beat Playboy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1304.44%.

Mattel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.45, signalling upside risk potential of 29.46%. On the other hand Playboy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could fall by -7.75%. Given that Mattel, Inc. has higher upside potential than Playboy, Inc., analysts believe Mattel, Inc. is more attractive than Playboy, Inc..

Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Playboy, Inc. has a beta of 2.659, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 165.853%.

Mattel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Playboy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Playboy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Playboy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29M. Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $106.3M is higher than Playboy, Inc.'s net income of $460K. Notably, Mattel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Playboy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel, Inc. is 0.95x versus 1.53x for Playboy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Mattel, Inc.'s net margin of --. Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.98% beat Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2's return on equity of --.

Mattel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.45, signalling upside risk potential of 29.46%. On the other hand Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mattel, Inc. has higher upside potential than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2, analysts believe Mattel, Inc. is more attractive than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2.

Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mattel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 quarterly revenues of --. Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $106.3M is higher than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2's net income of --. Notably, Mattel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel, Inc. is 0.95x versus -- for Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.