JAKK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro has a net margin of -2.1% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of 11.12%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74% beat Hasbro's return on equity of 36.13%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 88.14%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $76.01 which suggests that it could grow by 23.03%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Hasbro, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Hasbro.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.45% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.816%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Hasbro offers a yield of 4.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $113.3M, which are smaller than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $887.1M. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Hasbro's net income of $98.6M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.77x while Hasbro's PE ratio is 20.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.31x versus 2.04x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of -2.1% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of -4.88%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 88.14%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.73 which suggests that it could grow by 37.4%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Mattel.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.45% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.658%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $113.3M, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.77x while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.31x versus 1.08x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PLBY Group has a net margin of -2.1% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of -15.06%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74% beat PLBY Group's return on equity of -596.01%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 88.14%. On the other hand PLBY Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.05 which suggests that it could grow by 81.42%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than PLBY Group, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than PLBY Group.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.45% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PLBY Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. PLBY Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PLBY Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $113.3M, which are larger than PLBY Group quarterly revenues of $83.3M. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M is higher than PLBY Group's net income of -$12.5M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.77x while PLBY Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.31x versus 0.58x for PLBY Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SRM Entertainment has a net margin of -2.1% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of -128.81%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74% beat SRM Entertainment's return on equity of -112.23%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $36.50, signalling upside risk potential of 88.14%. On the other hand SRM Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than SRM Entertainment, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than SRM Entertainment.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.45% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SRM Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. SRM Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SRM Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $113.3M, which are larger than SRM Entertainment quarterly revenues of $876.4K. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M is lower than SRM Entertainment's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.77x while SRM Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.31x versus 1.20x for SRM Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.