PLBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro, Inc. has a net margin of 1.59% compared to Playboy, Inc.'s net margin of 16.86%. Playboy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1304.44% beat Hasbro, Inc.'s return on equity of -62.31%.

Playboy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.74%. On the other hand Hasbro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.54 which suggests that it could grow by 12.87%. Given that Playboy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hasbro, Inc., analysts believe Playboy, Inc. is more attractive than Hasbro, Inc..

Playboy, Inc. has a beta of 2.611, which suggesting that the stock is 161.094% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro, Inc. has a beta of 0.551, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.879%.

Playboy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hasbro, Inc. offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Playboy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro, Inc. pays out 76.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Playboy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $29M, which are smaller than Hasbro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Playboy, Inc.'s net income of $460K is lower than Hasbro, Inc.'s net income of $233.9M. Notably, Playboy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hasbro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Playboy, Inc. is 1.22x versus 2.62x for Hasbro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has a net margin of 1.59% compared to Playboy, Inc.'s net margin of 9.42%. Playboy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1304.44% beat JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.49%.

Playboy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.74%. On the other hand JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.50 which suggests that it could grow by 72%. Given that JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has higher upside potential than Playboy, Inc., analysts believe JAKKS Pacific, Inc. is more attractive than Playboy, Inc..

Playboy, Inc. has a beta of 2.611, which suggesting that the stock is 161.094% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has a beta of 1.470, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.003%.

Playboy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. offers a yield of 6.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Playboy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Playboy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $29M, which are smaller than JAKKS Pacific, Inc. quarterly revenues of $211.2M. Playboy, Inc.'s net income of $460K is lower than JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s net income of $19.9M. Notably, Playboy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Playboy, Inc. is 1.22x versus 0.32x for JAKKS Pacific, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel, Inc. has a net margin of 1.59% compared to Playboy, Inc.'s net margin of 16.04%. Playboy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1304.44% beat Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.4%.

Playboy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.74%. On the other hand Mattel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.92 which suggests that it could grow by 13.08%. Given that Playboy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mattel, Inc., analysts believe Playboy, Inc. is more attractive than Mattel, Inc..

Playboy, Inc. has a beta of 2.611, which suggesting that the stock is 161.094% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.629%.

Playboy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Playboy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Playboy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $29M, which are smaller than Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Playboy, Inc.'s net income of $460K is lower than Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $278.4M. Notably, Playboy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Playboy, Inc. is 1.22x versus 1.32x for Mattel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 has a net margin of 1.59% compared to Playboy, Inc.'s net margin of --. Playboy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1304.44% beat Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2's return on equity of --.

Playboy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.74%. On the other hand Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Playboy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2, analysts believe Playboy, Inc. is more attractive than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2.

Playboy, Inc. has a beta of 2.611, which suggesting that the stock is 161.094% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Playboy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Playboy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Playboy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $29M, which are larger than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2 quarterly revenues of --. Playboy, Inc.'s net income of $460K is higher than Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2's net income of --. Notably, Playboy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Playboy, Inc. is 1.22x versus -- for Corner Growth Acquisition Corp 2. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.