HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC plc has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 9.76%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36% beat TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.61%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $36.34, signalling upside risk potential of 0.94%. On the other hand TechnipFMC plc has an analysts' consensus of $61.14 which suggests that it could fall by -7.79%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than TechnipFMC plc.

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.866%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. TechnipFMC plc offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC plc pays out 8.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M is higher than TechnipFMC plc's net income of $244.6M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.86x while TechnipFMC plc's PE ratio is 28.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.38x versus 2.80x for TechnipFMC plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan, Inc. has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 23.01%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36% beat Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.8%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $36.34, signalling upside risk potential of 0.94%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.14 which suggests that it could fall by -3.39%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, Inc., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Kinder Morgan, Inc..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan, Inc. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.046%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Kinder Morgan, Inc. offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan, Inc. pays out 85.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M is lower than Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s net income of $1B. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.86x while Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.38x versus 4.40x for Kinder Morgan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 26.57%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36% beat Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.78%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $36.34, signalling upside risk potential of 0.94%. On the other hand Oceaneering International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.50 which suggests that it could fall by -22.54%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, Inc., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Oceaneering International, Inc..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International, Inc. has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.631%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Oceaneering International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Oceaneering International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $668.6M. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M is higher than Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net income of $177.7M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.86x while Oceaneering International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.38x versus 1.29x for Oceaneering International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 8.22%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.52%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $36.34, signalling upside risk potential of 0.94%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $55.30 which suggests that it could grow by 7.71%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.443%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 48.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M is lower than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $800M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.86x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.38x versus 2.07x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.