HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC plc has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 11.77%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36% beat TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $36.02, signalling upside risk potential of 2.97%. On the other hand TechnipFMC plc has an analysts' consensus of $50.45 which suggests that it could fall by -14.58%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than TechnipFMC plc.

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.866%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. TechnipFMC plc offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC plc pays out 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M is higher than TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.18x while TechnipFMC plc's PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.35x versus 2.56x for TechnipFMC plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan, Inc. has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 22.65%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36% beat Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.82%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $36.02, signalling upside risk potential of 2.97%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $31.76 which suggests that it could grow by 4.14%. Given that Kinder Morgan, Inc. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Kinder Morgan, Inc. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan, Inc. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.046%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Kinder Morgan, Inc. offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan, Inc. pays out 84.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M is lower than Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s net income of $1B. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.18x while Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.35x versus 4.01x for Kinder Morgan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 1.32%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36% beat Liberty Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.29%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $36.02, signalling upside risk potential of 2.97%. On the other hand Liberty Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $25.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.73%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than Liberty Energy, Inc., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Liberty Energy, Inc..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.99%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Liberty Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy, Inc. pays out 36.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Liberty Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M is higher than Liberty Energy, Inc.'s net income of $13.7M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.18x while Liberty Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.35x versus 1.04x for Liberty Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 8.22%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.52%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $36.02, signalling upside risk potential of 2.97%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $54.08 which suggests that it could grow by 6.67%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.443%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 48.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M is lower than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $800M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.18x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.35x versus 2.04x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.