HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories Inc. has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 10.8%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64% beat Core Laboratories Inc.'s return on equity of 12.42%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $31.21, signalling upside risk potential of 10.79%. On the other hand Core Laboratories Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could fall by -15.61%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than Core Laboratories Inc., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Core Laboratories Inc..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.814, which suggesting that the stock is 18.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories Inc. has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.262%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Core Laboratories Inc. offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories Inc. pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Core Laboratories Inc. quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M is higher than Core Laboratories Inc.'s net income of $14.5M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.65x while Core Laboratories Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.10x versus 1.52x for Core Laboratories Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TechnipFMC plc has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 11.77%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64% beat TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $31.21, signalling upside risk potential of 10.79%. On the other hand TechnipFMC plc has an analysts' consensus of $46.70 which suggests that it could grow by 3.41%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than TechnipFMC plc.

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.814, which suggesting that the stock is 18.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.254%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. TechnipFMC plc offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC plc pays out 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M is lower than TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.65x while TechnipFMC plc's PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.10x versus 1.96x for TechnipFMC plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 4.55%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64% beat Liberty Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.28%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $31.21, signalling upside risk potential of 10.79%. On the other hand Liberty Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.36 which suggests that it could grow by 4.35%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than Liberty Energy, Inc., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Liberty Energy, Inc..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.814, which suggesting that the stock is 18.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.647%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Liberty Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy, Inc. pays out 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Liberty Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $947.4M. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M is lower than Liberty Energy, Inc.'s net income of $43.1M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.65x while Liberty Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.10x versus 0.79x for Liberty Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 8.68%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $31.21, signalling upside risk potential of 10.79%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $45.99 which suggests that it could grow by 20.38%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.814, which suggesting that the stock is 18.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.082%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $8.9B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M is lower than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.65x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.10x versus 1.53x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.