HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories Inc. has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 10.8%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64% beat Core Laboratories Inc.'s return on equity of 12.42%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $31.72, signalling downside risk potential of -2.79%. On the other hand Core Laboratories Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could fall by -26.2%. Given that Core Laboratories Inc. has more downside risk than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Core Laboratories Inc..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories Inc. has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.479%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Core Laboratories Inc. offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories Inc. pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Core Laboratories Inc. quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M is higher than Core Laboratories Inc.'s net income of $14.5M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Core Laboratories Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.27x versus 1.73x for Core Laboratories Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 4.55%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64% beat Liberty Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.28%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $31.72, signalling downside risk potential of -2.79%. On the other hand Liberty Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.79 which suggests that it could grow by 0.59%. Given that Liberty Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Liberty Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.675%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Liberty Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy, Inc. pays out 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Liberty Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $947.4M. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M is lower than Liberty Energy, Inc.'s net income of $43.1M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Liberty Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.27x versus 0.83x for Liberty Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 8.68%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $31.72, signalling downside risk potential of -2.79%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $47.30 which suggests that it could grow by 4.64%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.18%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $8.9B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M is lower than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.27x versus 1.81x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weatherford International plc has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Halliburton Co.'s net margin of 7.06%. Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64% beat Weatherford International plc's return on equity of 31.19%.

Halliburton Co. has a consensus price target of $31.72, signalling downside risk potential of -2.79%. On the other hand Weatherford International plc has an analysts' consensus of $89.45 which suggests that it could grow by 0.24%. Given that Weatherford International plc has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Weatherford International plc is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weatherford International plc has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.424%.

Halliburton Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Weatherford International plc offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Halliburton Co. pays 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Weatherford International plc pays out 7.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Weatherford International plc quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M is lower than Weatherford International plc's net income of $87M. Notably, Halliburton Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Weatherford International plc's PE ratio is 16.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton Co. is 1.27x versus 1.31x for Weatherford International plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.