F Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of 6.27%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 8.1% beat General Motors's return on equity of 15.22%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $11.89, signalling upside risk potential of 22.11%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $59.21 which suggests that it could grow by 16.09%. Given that Ford Motor has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Ford Motor is more attractive than General Motors.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.639, which suggesting that the stock is 63.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.376%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.16%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Ford Motor pays 114.91% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 5.9% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ford Motor's is not.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $46.2B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $48.8B. Ford Motor's net income of $892M is lower than General Motors's net income of $3.1B. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.07x while General Motors's PE ratio is 5.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.21x versus 0.33x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of -496.14%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 8.1% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $11.89, signalling upside risk potential of 22.11%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could fall by -7.82%. Given that Ford Motor has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Ford Motor is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.639, which suggesting that the stock is 63.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.16%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 114.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $46.2B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. Ford Motor's net income of $892M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.07x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.21x versus 9.41x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of -125.86%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 8.1% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $11.89, signalling upside risk potential of 22.11%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.92 which suggests that it could grow by 5.01%. Given that Ford Motor has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Ford Motor is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.639, which suggesting that the stock is 63.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.16%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 114.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $46.2B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Ford Motor's net income of $892M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.07x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.21x versus 3.09x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of 8.61%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 8.1% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $11.89, signalling upside risk potential of 22.11%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $295.52 which suggests that it could fall by -25.17%. Given that Ford Motor has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Ford Motor is more attractive than Tesla.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.639, which suggesting that the stock is 63.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.16%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 114.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $46.2B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Ford Motor's net income of $892M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.07x while Tesla's PE ratio is 108.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.21x versus 14.19x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.