F Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group has a net margin of 1.16% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of -155.79%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $10.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.46%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 17.57%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.498, which suggesting that the stock is 49.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.2%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $40.7B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Ford Motor's net income of $471M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.23x versus 6.50x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 1.16% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of -4.88%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $10.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.46%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.64 which suggests that it could grow by 25.41%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.498, which suggesting that the stock is 49.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.573%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.2%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $40.7B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Ford Motor's net income of $471M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.23x versus 1.18x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 1.16% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of -43.95%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $10.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.46%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.87 which suggests that it could grow by 8.06%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.498, which suggesting that the stock is 49.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.2%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $40.7B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ford Motor's net income of $471M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.23x versus 2.89x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 1.16% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of 2.12%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $10.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.46%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $301.56 which suggests that it could fall by -8.38%. Given that Tesla has more downside risk than Ford Motor, analysts believe Ford Motor is more attractive than Tesla.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.498, which suggesting that the stock is 49.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.2%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $40.7B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Ford Motor's net income of $471M is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Tesla's PE ratio is 180.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.23x versus 12.05x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.