EMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AMETEK has a net margin of 14.01% compared to Emerson Electric's net margin of 21.98%. Emerson Electric's return on equity of 9% beat AMETEK's return on equity of 14.91%.

Emerson Electric has a consensus price target of $140.73, signalling upside risk potential of 25.82%. On the other hand AMETEK has an analysts' consensus of $199.15 which suggests that it could grow by 13.1%. Given that Emerson Electric has higher upside potential than AMETEK, analysts believe Emerson Electric is more attractive than AMETEK.

Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 36.035% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMETEK has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.226%.

Emerson Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. AMETEK offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Emerson Electric pays 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. AMETEK pays out 18.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emerson Electric quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than AMETEK quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Emerson Electric's net income of $585M is higher than AMETEK's net income of $387.3M. Notably, Emerson Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.69x while AMETEK's PE ratio is 29.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Electric is 3.65x versus 5.89x for AMETEK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EnerSys has a net margin of 14.01% compared to Emerson Electric's net margin of 12.67%. Emerson Electric's return on equity of 9% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25%.

Emerson Electric has a consensus price target of $140.73, signalling upside risk potential of 25.82%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $115.15 which suggests that it could grow by 17.94%. Given that Emerson Electric has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Emerson Electric is more attractive than EnerSys.

Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 36.035% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.08%.

Emerson Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. EnerSys offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Emerson Electric pays 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emerson Electric quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $906.2M. Emerson Electric's net income of $585M is higher than EnerSys's net income of $114.8M. Notably, Emerson Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.69x while EnerSys's PE ratio is 12.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Electric is 3.65x versus 1.12x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 14.01% compared to Emerson Electric's net margin of -697.46%. Emerson Electric's return on equity of 9% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -77.08%.

Emerson Electric has a consensus price target of $140.73, signalling upside risk potential of 25.82%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.33 which suggests that it could grow by 44.08%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Emerson Electric.

Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 36.035% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 1.981, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.137%.

Emerson Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Electric pays 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emerson Electric quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Emerson Electric's net income of $585M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Emerson Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.69x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Electric is 3.65x versus 2.02x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of 14.01% compared to Emerson Electric's net margin of 0.72%. Emerson Electric's return on equity of 9% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98%.

Emerson Electric has a consensus price target of $140.73, signalling upside risk potential of 25.82%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 143.48%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Emerson Electric.

Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 36.035% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.823%.

Emerson Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Electric pays 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emerson Electric quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Emerson Electric's net income of $585M is higher than Ultralife's net income of $258K. Notably, Emerson Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.69x while Ultralife's PE ratio is 10.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Electric is 3.65x versus 0.58x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.