EMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Plug Power, Inc. has a net margin of 13.1% compared to Emerson Electric Co.'s net margin of -205.31%. Emerson Electric Co.'s return on equity of 9.88% beat Plug Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.89%.

Emerson Electric Co. has a consensus price target of $151.21, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand Plug Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.79 which suggests that it could grow by 32.14%. Given that Plug Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric Co., analysts believe Plug Power, Inc. is more attractive than Emerson Electric Co..

Emerson Electric Co. has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power, Inc. has a beta of 1.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.116%.

Emerson Electric Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Plug Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Electric Co. pays 52.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emerson Electric Co. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Plug Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Emerson Electric Co.'s net income of $636M is higher than Plug Power, Inc.'s net income of -$363.5M. Notably, Emerson Electric Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.49x while Plug Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Electric Co. is 4.26x versus 3.23x for Plug Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen, Inc. has a net margin of 13.1% compared to Emerson Electric Co.'s net margin of -29.5%. Emerson Electric Co.'s return on equity of 9.88% beat Tecogen, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.73%.

Emerson Electric Co. has a consensus price target of $151.21, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand Tecogen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 193.54%. Given that Tecogen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric Co., analysts believe Tecogen, Inc. is more attractive than Emerson Electric Co..

Emerson Electric Co. has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen, Inc. has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.097%.

Emerson Electric Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Tecogen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Electric Co. pays 52.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emerson Electric Co. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Tecogen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Emerson Electric Co.'s net income of $636M is higher than Tecogen, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Emerson Electric Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.49x while Tecogen, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Electric Co. is 4.26x versus 4.77x for Tecogen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife Corp. has a net margin of 13.1% compared to Emerson Electric Co.'s net margin of -2.88%. Emerson Electric Co.'s return on equity of 9.88% beat Ultralife Corp.'s return on equity of 1.27%.

Emerson Electric Co. has a consensus price target of $151.21, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand Ultralife Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 136.49%. Given that Ultralife Corp. has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric Co., analysts believe Ultralife Corp. is more attractive than Emerson Electric Co..

Emerson Electric Co. has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife Corp. has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.416%.

Emerson Electric Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Ultralife Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Electric Co. pays 52.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emerson Electric Co. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Ultralife Corp. quarterly revenues of $43.4M. Emerson Electric Co.'s net income of $636M is higher than Ultralife Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Emerson Electric Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.49x while Ultralife Corp.'s PE ratio is 57.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Electric Co. is 4.26x versus 0.53x for Ultralife Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vertiv Holdings Co. has a net margin of 13.1% compared to Emerson Electric Co.'s net margin of 14.89%. Emerson Electric Co.'s return on equity of 9.88% beat Vertiv Holdings Co.'s return on equity of 38.17%.

Emerson Electric Co. has a consensus price target of $151.21, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand Vertiv Holdings Co. has an analysts' consensus of $196.61 which suggests that it could grow by 18.26%. Given that Vertiv Holdings Co. has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric Co., analysts believe Vertiv Holdings Co. is more attractive than Emerson Electric Co..

Emerson Electric Co. has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vertiv Holdings Co. has a beta of 2.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.628%.

Emerson Electric Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Vertiv Holdings Co. offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Emerson Electric Co. pays 52.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings Co. pays out 8.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emerson Electric Co. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Vertiv Holdings Co. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Emerson Electric Co.'s net income of $636M is higher than Vertiv Holdings Co.'s net income of $398.5M. Notably, Emerson Electric Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.49x while Vertiv Holdings Co.'s PE ratio is 62.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Electric Co. is 4.26x versus 6.68x for Vertiv Holdings Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.