VRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Plug Power has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of -147.12%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.47, signalling upside risk potential of 4.63%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.87 which suggests that it could grow by 131%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.702, which suggesting that the stock is 70.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.686%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.38x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 4.85x versus 1.09x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of -19.52%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Tecogen's return on equity of -38.59%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.47, signalling upside risk potential of 4.63%. On the other hand Tecogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.92%. Given that Tecogen has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Tecogen is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.702, which suggesting that the stock is 70.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.531%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Tecogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Tecogen quarterly revenues of $6.1M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Tecogen's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.38x while Tecogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 4.85x versus 4.34x for Tecogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thermon Group Holdings has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of 13.8%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Thermon Group Holdings's return on equity of 9.73%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.47, signalling upside risk potential of 4.63%. On the other hand Thermon Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $36.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.63%. Given that Thermon Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Thermon Group Holdings is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.702, which suggesting that the stock is 70.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thermon Group Holdings has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.599%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Thermon Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Thermon Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Thermon Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $134.4M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Thermon Group Holdings's net income of $18.5M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.38x while Thermon Group Holdings's PE ratio is 22.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 4.85x versus 2.10x for Thermon Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of 3.68%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.47, signalling upside risk potential of 4.63%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 153.62%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.702, which suggesting that the stock is 70.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.912%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $50.7M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Ultralife's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.38x while Ultralife's PE ratio is 17.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 4.85x versus 0.54x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.