ENS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 9.31% compared to EnerSys's net margin of 21.56%. EnerSys's return on equity of 16.44% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity of 7.34%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $103.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Emerson Electric has an analysts' consensus of $140.37 which suggests that it could grow by 13.12%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than Emerson Electric.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.341, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.059%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Emerson Electric offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $883.7M, which are smaller than Emerson Electric quarterly revenues of $4.6B. EnerSys's net income of $82.3M is lower than Emerson Electric's net income of $996M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Emerson Electric's PE ratio is 36.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.08x versus 4.07x for Emerson Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of 9.31% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -18.26%. EnerSys's return on equity of 16.44% beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -88.11%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $103.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 311.77%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.678%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $883.7M, which are larger than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $14.5M. EnerSys's net income of $82.3M is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.08x versus 0.44x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NeoVolta has a net margin of 9.31% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -163.41%. EnerSys's return on equity of 16.44% beat NeoVolta's return on equity of -55.85%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $103.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand NeoVolta has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 59.24%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. NeoVolta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $883.7M, which are larger than NeoVolta quarterly revenues of $590.2K. EnerSys's net income of $82.3M is higher than NeoVolta's net income of -$964.5K. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while NeoVolta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.08x versus 63.35x for NeoVolta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 9.31% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -121.55%. EnerSys's return on equity of 16.44% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -45.97%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $103.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.01 which suggests that it could grow by 6.68%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than Plug Power.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 1.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.272%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $883.7M, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $173.7M. EnerSys's net income of $82.3M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$211.2M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.08x versus 2.75x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.