How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Sell
19
FLUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.33
Seasonality move
:
8.59%
Day range:
$1.31 - $1.44
52-week range:
$1.15 - $7.55
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.35x
P/B ratio:
139.74x
Volume:
207.6K
Avg. volume:
212.2K
1-year change:
-20.48%
Market cap:
$28.2M
Revenue:
$66.4M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.45
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$18.8M | -$0.02 | -7.61% | -46.95% | $5.67 |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
$26.8M | -$0.04 | 107.02% | -49.62% | $17.57 |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
$909.6M | $2.64 | 0.2% | 21.03% | $174.60 |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
$4.9M | -- | 254.61% | -- | $7.50 |
|
PLUG
Plug Power, Inc.
|
$191.8M | -$0.08 | 23.38% | -56.43% | $2.75 |
|
TGEN
Tecogen, Inc.
|
$7.6M | -$0.06 | -22.15% | -110.08% | $15.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.32 | $5.67 | $28.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.35x |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
$12.44 | $17.57 | $1.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 25.73x |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
$180.19 | $174.60 | $6.7B | 21.06x | $0.26 | 0.56% | 1.90x |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
$4.21 | $7.50 | $146.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 9.83x |
|
PLUG
Plug Power, Inc.
|
$2.12 | $2.75 | $2.9B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.24x |
|
TGEN
Tecogen, Inc.
|
$3.74 | $15.00 | $111.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.49x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
142.23% | 1.526 | 17.73% | 0.28x |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
26.76% | 6.124 | 2.75% | 5.94x |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
39.43% | 0.848 | 28.85% | 1.25x |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
69.52% | 2.202 | 3.19% | 1.15x |
|
PLUG
Plug Power, Inc.
|
41.17% | 5.626 | 34.43% | 0.66x |
|
TGEN
Tecogen, Inc.
|
10.06% | 6.254 | 1.08% | 1.83x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$3.5M | -$2.2M | -73.21% | -490.96% | -16.53% | $726K |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
$3.3M | -$4.7M | -27.53% | -41.32% | -21.9% | -$9.7M |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
$279.4M | $115.4M | 10.82% | 18.05% | 12.13% | $197.1M |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
$1.6M | -$854.3K | -100.27% | -165.36% | -12.85% | -$2.5M |
|
PLUG
Plug Power, Inc.
|
-$120.2M | -$246.9M | -70.78% | -105.89% | -139.43% | -$119.9M |
|
TGEN
Tecogen, Inc.
|
$2.2M | -$2.1M | -32.68% | -41.73% | -29.22% | -$3.6M |
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUX or AMPX?
Amprius Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -19.45% compared to Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -18.17%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96% beat Amprius Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.26.67% -$0.15 $7.9M AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc.15.49% -$0.03 $140.9M -
What do Analysts Say About FLUX or AMPX?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.67, signalling upside risk potential of 329.29%. On the other hand Amprius Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.57 which suggests that it could grow by 41.25%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Amprius Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Amprius Technologies, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.3 0 0 AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc.7 0 0 -
Is FLUX or AMPX More Risky?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.298% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amprius Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUX or AMPX?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amprius Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amprius Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUX or AMPX?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.2M, which are smaller than Amprius Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $21.4M. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M is higher than Amprius Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amprius Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is 0.35x versus 25.73x for Amprius Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.0.35x -- $13.2M -$2.6M AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc.25.73x -- $21.4M -$3.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUX or ENS?
EnerSys has a net margin of -19.45% compared to Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.19%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 18.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.26.67% -$0.15 $7.9M ENSEnerSys29.37% $1.80 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About FLUX or ENS?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.67, signalling upside risk potential of 329.29%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $174.60 which suggests that it could fall by -3.1%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than EnerSys.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.3 0 0 ENSEnerSys3 2 0 -
Is FLUX or ENS More Risky?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.298% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.265%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUX or ENS?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 10.51% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUX or ENS?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.2M, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $951.3M. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than EnerSys's net income of $68.4M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EnerSys's PE ratio is 21.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is 0.35x versus 1.90x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.0.35x -- $13.2M -$2.6M ENSEnerSys1.90x 21.06x $951.3M $68.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUX or NEOV?
NeoVolta, Inc. has a net margin of -19.45% compared to Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -18.7%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96% beat NeoVolta, Inc.'s return on equity of -165.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.26.67% -$0.15 $7.9M NEOVNeoVolta, Inc.23.72% -$0.04 $7M -
What do Analysts Say About FLUX or NEOV?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.67, signalling upside risk potential of 329.29%. On the other hand NeoVolta, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 78.15%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than NeoVolta, Inc., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than NeoVolta, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.3 0 0 NEOVNeoVolta, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is FLUX or NEOV More Risky?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.298% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta, Inc. has a beta of -0.340, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 134.022%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUX or NEOV?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NeoVolta, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUX or NEOV?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.2M, which are larger than NeoVolta, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than NeoVolta, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NeoVolta, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is 0.35x versus 9.83x for NeoVolta, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.0.35x -- $13.2M -$2.6M NEOVNeoVolta, Inc.9.83x -- $6.7M -$1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUX or PLUG?
Plug Power, Inc. has a net margin of -19.45% compared to Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -205.31%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96% beat Plug Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.26.67% -$0.15 $7.9M PLUGPlug Power, Inc.-67.87% -$0.31 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About FLUX or PLUG?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.67, signalling upside risk potential of 329.29%. On the other hand Plug Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 30.02%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Plug Power, Inc., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Plug Power, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.3 0 0 PLUGPlug Power, Inc.5 13 3 -
Is FLUX or PLUG More Risky?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.298% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power, Inc. has a beta of 1.681, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.121%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUX or PLUG?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUX or PLUG?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.2M, which are smaller than Plug Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M is higher than Plug Power, Inc.'s net income of -$363.5M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is 0.35x versus 3.24x for Plug Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.0.35x -- $13.2M -$2.6M PLUGPlug Power, Inc.3.24x -- $177.1M -$363.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FLUX or TGEN?
Tecogen, Inc. has a net margin of -19.45% compared to Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -29.5%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96% beat Tecogen, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.26.67% -$0.15 $7.9M TGENTecogen, Inc.30.4% -$0.07 $28.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FLUX or TGEN?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.67, signalling upside risk potential of 329.29%. On the other hand Tecogen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 301.07%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tecogen, Inc., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Tecogen, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.3 0 0 TGENTecogen, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is FLUX or TGEN More Risky?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.298% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen, Inc. has a beta of 1.286, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.581%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLUX or TGEN?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tecogen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLUX or TGEN?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.2M, which are larger than Tecogen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than Tecogen, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tecogen, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is 0.35x versus 3.49x for Tecogen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.0.35x -- $13.2M -$2.6M TGENTecogen, Inc.3.49x -- $7.2M -$2.1M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Alerts
Sell
40
GDXU alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 38.85% over the past day.
Sell
34
PFSI alert for Jan 31
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. [PFSI] is down 33.21% over the past day.
Sell
40
SHNY alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN [SHNY] is down 31.56% over the past day.
