FLUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloom Energy Corp. has a net margin of -19.45% compared to Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -4.42%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96% beat Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 2.82%.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.67, signalling upside risk potential of 245.53%. On the other hand Bloom Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $111.81 which suggests that it could grow by 9.08%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy Corp., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Bloom Energy Corp..

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.677% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 2.997, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 199.742%.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bloom Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy Corp. pays out 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.2M, which are smaller than Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $519M. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M is higher than Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of -$23M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bloom Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 28,448.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 13.98x for Bloom Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EnerSys has a net margin of -19.45% compared to Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.19%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 18.05%.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.67, signalling upside risk potential of 245.53%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $144.00 which suggests that it could fall by -7.5%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than EnerSys.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.677% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.982%.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 10.51% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.2M, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $951.3M. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than EnerSys's net income of $68.4M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EnerSys's PE ratio is 17.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 1.54x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NeoVolta, Inc. has a net margin of -19.45% compared to Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -18.7%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96% beat NeoVolta, Inc.'s return on equity of -165.36%.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.67, signalling upside risk potential of 245.53%. On the other hand NeoVolta, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 80.72%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than NeoVolta, Inc., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than NeoVolta, Inc..

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.677% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta, Inc. has a beta of -0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.482%.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NeoVolta, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.2M, which are larger than NeoVolta, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than NeoVolta, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NeoVolta, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 9.69x for NeoVolta, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power, Inc. has a net margin of -19.45% compared to Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -205.31%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96% beat Plug Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.89%.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.67, signalling upside risk potential of 245.53%. On the other hand Plug Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.79 which suggests that it could grow by 25.03%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Plug Power, Inc., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Plug Power, Inc..

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.677% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power, Inc. has a beta of 1.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.116%.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.2M, which are smaller than Plug Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M is higher than Plug Power, Inc.'s net income of -$363.5M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 3.42x for Plug Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.