YZCAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PetroChina has a net margin of 11.53% compared to Yankuang Energy Group's net margin of 6.25%. Yankuang Energy Group's return on equity of 13.66% beat PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77%.

Yankuang Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Yankuang Energy Group has higher upside potential than PetroChina, analysts believe Yankuang Energy Group is more attractive than PetroChina.

Yankuang Energy Group has a beta of 0.150, which suggesting that the stock is 84.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.939%.

Yankuang Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.27%. PetroChina offers a yield of 8.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Yankuang Energy Group pays 124.62% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina pays out 60.33% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Yankuang Energy Group's is not.

Yankuang Energy Group quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than PetroChina quarterly revenues of $98.1B. Yankuang Energy Group's net income of $552.7M is lower than PetroChina's net income of $6.1B. Notably, Yankuang Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.96x while PetroChina's PE ratio is 5.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yankuang Energy Group is 0.66x versus 0.32x for PetroChina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Recon Technology has a net margin of 11.53% compared to Yankuang Energy Group's net margin of --. Yankuang Energy Group's return on equity of 13.66% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.

Yankuang Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Yankuang Energy Group has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe Yankuang Energy Group is more attractive than Recon Technology.

Yankuang Energy Group has a beta of 0.150, which suggesting that the stock is 84.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 2.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.347%.

Yankuang Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.27%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yankuang Energy Group pays 124.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Yankuang Energy Group quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. Yankuang Energy Group's net income of $552.7M is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, Yankuang Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.96x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yankuang Energy Group is 0.66x versus 1.98x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a net margin of 11.53% compared to Yankuang Energy Group's net margin of 1.02%. Yankuang Energy Group's return on equity of 13.66% beat China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14%.

Yankuang Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Yankuang Energy Group has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical, analysts believe Yankuang Energy Group is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical.

Yankuang Energy Group has a beta of 0.150, which suggesting that the stock is 84.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.191%.

Yankuang Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.27%. China Petroleum & Chemical offers a yield of 9.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Yankuang Energy Group pays 124.62% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Yankuang Energy Group quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues of $110.4B. Yankuang Energy Group's net income of $552.7M is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Yankuang Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.96x while China Petroleum & Chemical's PE ratio is 9.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yankuang Energy Group is 0.66x versus 0.15x for China Petroleum & Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of 11.53% compared to Yankuang Energy Group's net margin of 1.24%. Yankuang Energy Group's return on equity of 13.66% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 9.65%.

Yankuang Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Yankuang Energy Group has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe Yankuang Energy Group is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.

Yankuang Energy Group has a beta of 0.150, which suggesting that the stock is 84.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.79%.

Yankuang Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.27%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yankuang Energy Group pays 124.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 120.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yankuang Energy Group quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Yankuang Energy Group's net income of $552.7M is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Yankuang Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.96x while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 10.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yankuang Energy Group is 0.66x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.