VYGPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of -0.87% compared to Carta Holdings's net margin of 5.53%. Carta Holdings's return on equity of 0.3% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.18%.

Carta Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carta Holdings has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe Carta Holdings is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Carta Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.696, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.449%.

Carta Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Carta Holdings pays -57.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carta Holdings quarterly revenues are $38M, which are smaller than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $505M. Carta Holdings's net income of -$329.9K is lower than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $27.9M. Notably, Carta Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 505.90x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 25.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carta Holdings is 1.45x versus 1.65x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KDDI has a net margin of -0.87% compared to Carta Holdings's net margin of 12.74%. Carta Holdings's return on equity of 0.3% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.1%.

Carta Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carta Holdings has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Carta Holdings is more attractive than KDDI.

Carta Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.060, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.049%.

Carta Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Carta Holdings pays -57.5% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carta Holdings quarterly revenues are $38M, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $8.9B. Carta Holdings's net income of -$329.9K is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Carta Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 505.90x while KDDI's PE ratio is 15.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carta Holdings is 1.45x versus 1.68x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of -0.87% compared to Carta Holdings's net margin of 8.46%. Carta Holdings's return on equity of 0.3% beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 12.71%.

Carta Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.01%. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than Carta Holdings, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than Carta Holdings.

Carta Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.142, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.768%.

Carta Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Carta Holdings pays -57.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carta Holdings quarterly revenues are $38M, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $20.8B. Carta Holdings's net income of -$329.9K is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Carta Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 505.90x while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carta Holdings is 1.45x versus 0.93x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of -0.87% compared to Carta Holdings's net margin of --. Carta Holdings's return on equity of 0.3% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Carta Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carta Holdings has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Carta Holdings is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Carta Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Carta Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.7%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carta Holdings pays -57.5% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carta Holdings quarterly revenues are $38M, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Carta Holdings's net income of -$329.9K is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Carta Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 505.90x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carta Holdings is 1.45x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.