IIJIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KDDI Corp. has a net margin of 7.43% compared to Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net margin of 14.82%. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9% beat KDDI Corp.'s return on equity of 14.01%.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has higher upside potential than KDDI Corp., analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is more attractive than KDDI Corp..

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI Corp. has a beta of 0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.713%.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KDDI Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI Corp. pays out 29.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues are $577M, which are smaller than KDDI Corp. quarterly revenues of $10.4B. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M is lower than KDDI Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while KDDI Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is 1.46x versus 1.70x for KDDI Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NTT, Inc. has a net margin of 7.43% compared to Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net margin of 10.04%. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9% beat NTT, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.46%.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NTT, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has higher upside potential than NTT, Inc., analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is more attractive than NTT, Inc..

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NTT, Inc. has a beta of 0.120, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.966%.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NTT, Inc. offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. NTT, Inc. pays out 43.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues are $577M, which are smaller than NTT, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.8B. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M is lower than NTT, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while NTT, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is 1.46x versus 0.86x for NTT, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a net margin of 7.43% compared to Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net margin of --. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9% beat PicoCELA, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, Inc., analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is more attractive than PicoCELA, Inc..

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PicoCELA, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues are $577M, which are larger than PicoCELA, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M is higher than PicoCELA, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while PicoCELA, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is 1.46x versus 6.68x for PicoCELA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.