IIJIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CTW Cayman has a net margin of 7.43% compared to Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net margin of --. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9% beat CTW Cayman's return on equity of --.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CTW Cayman has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has higher upside potential than CTW Cayman, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is more attractive than CTW Cayman.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CTW Cayman has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CTW Cayman offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. CTW Cayman pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues are $577M, which are larger than CTW Cayman quarterly revenues of --. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M is higher than CTW Cayman's net income of --. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.89x while CTW Cayman's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is 1.48x versus -- for CTW Cayman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NTT, Inc. has a net margin of 7.43% compared to Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net margin of 10.04%. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9% beat NTT, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.46%.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NTT, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.35%. Given that NTT, Inc. has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc., analysts believe NTT, Inc. is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc..

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NTT, Inc. has a beta of 0.123, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.661%.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NTT, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. NTT, Inc. pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues are $577M, which are smaller than NTT, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.8B. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M is lower than NTT, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.89x while NTT, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is 1.48x versus 0.89x for NTT, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a net margin of 7.43% compared to Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net margin of --. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9% beat PicoCELA, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, Inc., analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is more attractive than PicoCELA, Inc..

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PicoCELA, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues are $577M, which are larger than PicoCELA, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M is higher than PicoCELA, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.89x while PicoCELA, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. is 1.48x versus 6.68x for PicoCELA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.