GMOYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CTW Cayman has a net margin of 11.15% compared to GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.28% beat CTW Cayman's return on equity of --.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CTW Cayman has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GMO Internet Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than CTW Cayman, analysts believe GMO Internet Group, Inc. is more attractive than CTW Cayman.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CTW Cayman has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. CTW Cayman offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GMO Internet Group, Inc. pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. CTW Cayman pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $483.2M, which are larger than CTW Cayman quarterly revenues of --. GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s net income of $53.9M is higher than CTW Cayman's net income of --. Notably, GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.65x while CTW Cayman's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMO Internet Group, Inc. is 1.38x versus -- for CTW Cayman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a net margin of 11.15% compared to GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s net margin of 7.43%. GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.28% beat Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9%.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GMO Internet Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc., analysts believe GMO Internet Group, Inc. is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc..

GMO Internet Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.572%.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. GMO Internet Group, Inc. pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays out 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $483.2M, which are smaller than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $577M. GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s net income of $53.9M is higher than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M. Notably, GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.65x while Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMO Internet Group, Inc. is 1.38x versus 1.42x for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a net margin of 11.15% compared to GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.28% beat PicoCELA, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GMO Internet Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, Inc., analysts believe GMO Internet Group, Inc. is more attractive than PicoCELA, Inc..

GMO Internet Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. PicoCELA, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GMO Internet Group, Inc. pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GMO Internet Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $483.2M, which are larger than PicoCELA, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s net income of $53.9M is higher than PicoCELA, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, GMO Internet Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.65x while PicoCELA, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMO Internet Group, Inc. is 1.38x versus 6.68x for PicoCELA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.