KDDIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CTW Cayman has a net margin of 14.82% compared to KDDI Corp.'s net margin of --. KDDI Corp.'s return on equity of 14.01% beat CTW Cayman's return on equity of --.

KDDI Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CTW Cayman has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KDDI Corp. has higher upside potential than CTW Cayman, analysts believe KDDI Corp. is more attractive than CTW Cayman.

KDDI Corp. has a beta of 0.063, which suggesting that the stock is 93.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CTW Cayman has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

KDDI Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CTW Cayman offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KDDI Corp. pays 29.91% of its earnings as a dividend. CTW Cayman pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KDDI Corp. quarterly revenues are $10.4B, which are larger than CTW Cayman quarterly revenues of --. KDDI Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than CTW Cayman's net income of --. Notably, KDDI Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.17x while CTW Cayman's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KDDI Corp. is 1.68x versus -- for CTW Cayman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a net margin of 14.82% compared to KDDI Corp.'s net margin of 7.43%. KDDI Corp.'s return on equity of 14.01% beat Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9%.

KDDI Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KDDI Corp. has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc., analysts believe KDDI Corp. is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc..

KDDI Corp. has a beta of 0.063, which suggesting that the stock is 93.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.572%.

KDDI Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. KDDI Corp. pays 29.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays out 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KDDI Corp. quarterly revenues are $10.4B, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $577M. KDDI Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M. Notably, KDDI Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.17x while Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KDDI Corp. is 1.68x versus 1.44x for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a net margin of 14.82% compared to KDDI Corp.'s net margin of --. KDDI Corp.'s return on equity of 14.01% beat PicoCELA, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

KDDI Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KDDI Corp. has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, Inc., analysts believe KDDI Corp. is more attractive than PicoCELA, Inc..

KDDI Corp. has a beta of 0.063, which suggesting that the stock is 93.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

KDDI Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PicoCELA, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KDDI Corp. pays 29.91% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KDDI Corp. quarterly revenues are $10.4B, which are larger than PicoCELA, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. KDDI Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than PicoCELA, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, KDDI Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.17x while PicoCELA, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KDDI Corp. is 1.68x versus 6.68x for PicoCELA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.