Financhill
Sell
13

BLMZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.04
Seasonality move :
-32.95%
Day range:
$0.98 - $1.16
52-week range:
$0.60 - $7.19
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
11.81x
P/B ratio:
0.83x
Volume:
139K
Avg. volume:
638.2K
1-year change:
-82.68%
Market cap:
$1.5M
Revenue:
$1.5M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.01

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BLMZ
Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
CTW
CTW Cayman
-- -- -- -- --
IIJIY
Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.
$547.6M -- 3.57% -- --
NTTYY
NTT, Inc.
$23.6B -- 0.64% -- --
PCLA
PicoCELA, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BLMZ
Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
$1.02 -- $1.5M -- $0.00 0% 11.81x
CTW
CTW Cayman
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
IIJIY
Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.
$37.00 -- $3.3B 21.89x $0.24 0% 1.48x
NTTYY
NTT, Inc.
$24.92 -- $82.5B 11.81x $0.45 0% 0.89x
PCLA
PicoCELA, Inc.
$0.29 -- $10.1M -- $0.00 0% 6.68x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BLMZ
Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
16.89% 3.511 -- 0.31x
CTW
CTW Cayman
-- 0.000 -- --
IIJIY
Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.
33.21% 0.165 16.29% 0.75x
NTTYY
NTT, Inc.
62.87% 0.118 119.27% 0.72x
PCLA
PicoCELA, Inc.
-- 0.000 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BLMZ
Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
-- -- -9.86% -16.01% -- --
CTW
CTW Cayman
-- -- -- -- -- --
IIJIY
Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.
$125M $55.4M 10.5% 15.9% 9.6% $40.9M
NTTYY
NTT, Inc.
$4.1B $3.8B 4.76% 10.46% 16.08% $243M
PCLA
PicoCELA, Inc.
-- -- -- -- -- --

Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BLMZ or CTW?

    CTW Cayman has a net margin of -- compared to Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -16.01% beat CTW Cayman's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    -- -- $1.7M
    CTW
    CTW Cayman
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About BLMZ or CTW?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CTW Cayman has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than CTW Cayman, analysts believe Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than CTW Cayman.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    0 0 0
    CTW
    CTW Cayman
    0 0 0
  • Is BLMZ or CTW More Risky?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CTW Cayman has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLMZ or CTW?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CTW Cayman offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CTW Cayman pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BLMZ or CTW?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CTW Cayman quarterly revenues of --. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than CTW Cayman's net income of --. Notably, Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CTW Cayman's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. is 11.81x versus -- for CTW Cayman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    11.81x -- -- --
    CTW
    CTW Cayman
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BLMZ or IIJIY?

    Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.43%. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -16.01% beat Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    -- -- $1.7M
    IIJIY
    Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.
    21.67% $0.48 $1.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About BLMZ or IIJIY?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc., analysts believe Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    0 0 0
    IIJIY
    Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is BLMZ or IIJIY More Risky?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.572%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLMZ or IIJIY?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays out 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BLMZ or IIJIY?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $577M. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M. Notably, Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. is 11.81x versus 1.48x for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    11.81x -- -- --
    IIJIY
    Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.
    1.48x 21.89x $577M $42.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns BLMZ or NTTYY?

    NTT, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.04%. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -16.01% beat NTT, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.46%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    -- -- $1.7M
    NTTYY
    NTT, Inc.
    17.15% $0.69 $170.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About BLMZ or NTTYY?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NTT, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.35%. Given that NTT, Inc. has higher upside potential than Harrison Global Holdings, Inc., analysts believe NTT, Inc. is more attractive than Harrison Global Holdings, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    0 0 0
    NTTYY
    NTT, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is BLMZ or NTTYY More Risky?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NTT, Inc. has a beta of 0.123, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.661%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLMZ or NTTYY?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NTT, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NTT, Inc. pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NTT, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BLMZ or NTTYY?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NTT, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.8B. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than NTT, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NTT, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. is 11.81x versus 0.89x for NTT, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    11.81x -- -- --
    NTTYY
    NTT, Inc.
    0.89x 11.81x $23.8B $2.4B
  • Which has Higher Returns BLMZ or PCLA?

    PicoCELA, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -16.01% beat PicoCELA, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    -- -- $1.7M
    PCLA
    PicoCELA, Inc.
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About BLMZ or PCLA?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, Inc., analysts believe Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than PicoCELA, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    0 0 0
    PCLA
    PicoCELA, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is BLMZ or PCLA More Risky?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLMZ or PCLA?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PicoCELA, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BLMZ or PCLA?

    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PicoCELA, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than PicoCELA, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PicoCELA, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harrison Global Holdings, Inc. is 11.81x versus 6.68x for PicoCELA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BLMZ
    Harrison Global Holdings, Inc.
    11.81x -- -- --
    PCLA
    PicoCELA, Inc.
    6.68x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4

Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.

Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.

Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4

Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock