VLVCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electrolux AB has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Volvo Car AB's net margin of 0.59%. Volvo Car AB's return on equity of -0.39% beat Electrolux AB's return on equity of 6.49%.

Volvo Car AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electrolux AB has an analysts' consensus of $18.13 which suggests that it could grow by 32.94%. Given that Electrolux AB has higher upside potential than Volvo Car AB, analysts believe Electrolux AB is more attractive than Volvo Car AB.

Volvo Car AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electrolux AB has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.793%.

Volvo Car AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electrolux AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Volvo Car AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electrolux AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Volvo Car AB quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than Electrolux AB quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Volvo Car AB's net income of $474M is higher than Electrolux AB's net income of $20.2M. Notably, Volvo Car AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.74x while Electrolux AB's PE ratio is 33.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo Car AB is 0.29x versus 0.14x for Electrolux AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Volvo Car AB's net margin of 5.63%. Volvo Car AB's return on equity of -0.39% beat H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 26.16%.

Volvo Car AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo Car AB has higher upside potential than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Volvo Car AB is more attractive than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB.

Volvo Car AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.223, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.262%.

Volvo Car AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Volvo Car AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays out 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo Car AB quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues of $6B. Volvo Car AB's net income of $474M is higher than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $335.3M. Notably, Volvo Car AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.74x while H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's PE ratio is 28.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo Car AB is 0.29x versus 1.36x for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nobia AB has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Volvo Car AB's net margin of -82.8%. Volvo Car AB's return on equity of -0.39% beat Nobia AB's return on equity of -77.99%.

Volvo Car AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nobia AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo Car AB has higher upside potential than Nobia AB, analysts believe Volvo Car AB is more attractive than Nobia AB.

Volvo Car AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nobia AB has a beta of 0.495, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.512%.

Volvo Car AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nobia AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Volvo Car AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nobia AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Volvo Car AB quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than Nobia AB quarterly revenues of $242.5M. Volvo Car AB's net income of $474M is higher than Nobia AB's net income of -$200.8M. Notably, Volvo Car AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.74x while Nobia AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo Car AB is 0.29x versus 0.20x for Nobia AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Volvo Car AB's net margin of -46.62%. Volvo Car AB's return on equity of -0.39% beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's return on equity of --.

Volvo Car AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 109.35%. Given that Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has higher upside potential than Volvo Car AB, analysts believe Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc is more attractive than Volvo Car AB.

Volvo Car AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Volvo Car AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Volvo Car AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Volvo Car AB quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc quarterly revenues of $572.6M. Volvo Car AB's net income of $474M is higher than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's net income of -$267M. Notably, Volvo Car AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.74x while Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo Car AB is 0.29x versus 0.40x for Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.