HNNMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electrolux AB has a net margin of 7.32% compared to H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of 1.33%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 29.71% beat Electrolux AB's return on equity of 10.44%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electrolux AB has an analysts' consensus of $19.18 which suggests that it could grow by 12.19%. Given that Electrolux AB has higher upside potential than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Electrolux AB is more attractive than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electrolux AB has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.221%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.54%. Electrolux AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Electrolux AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Electrolux AB quarterly revenues of $3.7B. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $459.1M is higher than Electrolux AB's net income of $49.5M. Notably, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.59x while Electrolux AB's PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.40x versus 0.18x for Electrolux AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nobia AB has a net margin of 7.32% compared to H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of -16.29%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 29.71% beat Nobia AB's return on equity of -80.43%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nobia AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has higher upside potential than Nobia AB, analysts believe H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is more attractive than Nobia AB.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nobia AB has a beta of 0.497, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.321%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.54%. Nobia AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Nobia AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Nobia AB quarterly revenues of $148.8M. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $459.1M is higher than Nobia AB's net income of -$24.2M. Notably, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.59x while Nobia AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.40x versus 0.27x for Nobia AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of -46.62%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 29.71% beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's return on equity of --.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.66%. Given that Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has higher upside potential than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc is more attractive than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.54%. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc quarterly revenues of $572.6M. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $459.1M is higher than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's net income of -$267M. Notably, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.59x while Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.40x versus 0.48x for Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volvo Car AB has a net margin of 7.32% compared to H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of -0.37%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 29.71% beat Volvo Car AB's return on equity of -2.1%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Volvo Car AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has higher upside potential than Volvo Car AB, analysts believe H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is more attractive than Volvo Car AB.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volvo Car AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.54%. Volvo Car AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Volvo Car AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are smaller than Volvo Car AB quarterly revenues of $10B. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $459.1M is higher than Volvo Car AB's net income of -$37.2M. Notably, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.59x while Volvo Car AB's PE ratio is 460.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.40x versus 0.23x for Volvo Car AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.