HNNMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electrolux AB has a net margin of 5.63% compared to H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of 0.59%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 26.16% beat Electrolux AB's return on equity of 6.49%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electrolux AB has an analysts' consensus of $18.13 which suggests that it could grow by 34.11%. Given that Electrolux AB has higher upside potential than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Electrolux AB is more attractive than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.223, which suggesting that the stock is 22.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electrolux AB has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.793%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Electrolux AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Electrolux AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Electrolux AB quarterly revenues of $3.4B. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $335.3M is higher than Electrolux AB's net income of $20.2M. Notably, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.36x while Electrolux AB's PE ratio is 32.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.41x versus 0.14x for Electrolux AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution AB has a net margin of 5.63% compared to H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of 49.76%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 26.16% beat Evolution AB's return on equity of 28.72%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolution AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is more attractive than Evolution AB.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.223, which suggesting that the stock is 22.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution AB has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.427%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Evolution AB offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.14 per share. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB pays out 45.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Evolution AB quarterly revenues of $592.6M. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $335.3M is higher than Evolution AB's net income of $294.9M. Notably, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.36x while Evolution AB's PE ratio is 11.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.41x versus 6.02x for Evolution AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nobia AB has a net margin of 5.63% compared to H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of -82.8%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 26.16% beat Nobia AB's return on equity of -77.99%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nobia AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has higher upside potential than Nobia AB, analysts believe H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is more attractive than Nobia AB.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.223, which suggesting that the stock is 22.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nobia AB has a beta of 0.495, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.512%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Nobia AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Nobia AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Nobia AB quarterly revenues of $242.5M. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $335.3M is higher than Nobia AB's net income of -$200.8M. Notably, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.36x while Nobia AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.41x versus 0.20x for Nobia AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a net margin of 5.63% compared to H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of -46.62%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 26.16% beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's return on equity of --.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 71.04%. Given that Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has higher upside potential than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc is more attractive than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.223, which suggesting that the stock is 22.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc quarterly revenues of $572.6M. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $335.3M is higher than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's net income of -$267M. Notably, H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.36x while Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.41x versus 0.48x for Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.