ALV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 6.47% compared to Autoliv, Inc.'s net margin of 12.24%. Autoliv, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.41% beat Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 72.98%.

Autoliv, Inc. has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $56.40 which suggests that it could grow by 8.65%. Given that Autoliv, Inc. has higher upside potential than Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Autoliv, Inc. is more attractive than Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc..

Autoliv, Inc. has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.403% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Autoliv, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Autoliv, Inc. pays 34.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc. pays out 4.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $447.7M. Autoliv, Inc.'s net income of $175M is higher than Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $54.8M. Notably, Autoliv, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv, Inc. is 0.87x versus 2.50x for Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 6.47% compared to Autoliv, Inc.'s net margin of -1.1%. Autoliv, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.41% beat Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Autoliv, Inc. has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.76%. Given that Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autoliv, Inc., analysts believe Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Autoliv, Inc..

Autoliv, Inc. has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.403% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.958, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.834%.

Autoliv, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoliv, Inc. pays 34.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoliv, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $695.5M. Autoliv, Inc.'s net income of $175M is higher than Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$7.6M. Notably, Autoliv, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv, Inc. is 0.87x versus 0.22x for Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex Corp. has a net margin of 6.47% compared to Autoliv, Inc.'s net margin of 15.16%. Autoliv, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.41% beat Gentex Corp.'s return on equity of 15.19%.

Autoliv, Inc. has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Gentex Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $29.81 which suggests that it could grow by 28.12%. Given that Gentex Corp. has higher upside potential than Autoliv, Inc., analysts believe Gentex Corp. is more attractive than Autoliv, Inc..

Autoliv, Inc. has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.403% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex Corp. has a beta of 0.777, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.31%.

Autoliv, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Gentex Corp. offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Autoliv, Inc. pays 34.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex Corp. pays out 27.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Gentex Corp. quarterly revenues of $655.2M. Autoliv, Inc.'s net income of $175M is higher than Gentex Corp.'s net income of $99.4M. Notably, Autoliv, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Gentex Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv, Inc. is 0.87x versus 2.12x for Gentex Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solid Power, Inc. has a net margin of 6.47% compared to Autoliv, Inc.'s net margin of -567.26%. Autoliv, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.41% beat Solid Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.25%.

Autoliv, Inc. has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Solid Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.71%. Given that Solid Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autoliv, Inc., analysts believe Solid Power, Inc. is more attractive than Autoliv, Inc..

Autoliv, Inc. has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.403% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solid Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Autoliv, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Solid Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoliv, Inc. pays 34.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Solid Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoliv, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Solid Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Autoliv, Inc.'s net income of $175M is higher than Solid Power, Inc.'s net income of -$25.9M. Notably, Autoliv, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Solid Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv, Inc. is 0.87x versus 34.07x for Solid Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.