APTV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Aptiv PLC's net margin of -6.21%. Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 16.76% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Aptiv PLC has a consensus price target of $80.43, signalling upside risk potential of 47.79%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $60.14 which suggests that it could grow by 31.49%. Given that Aptiv PLC has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Aptiv PLC is more attractive than General Motors.

Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.509%.

Aptiv PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Aptiv PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Aptiv PLC's net income of $268M is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Aptiv PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aptiv PLC is 0.71x versus 0.28x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mobileye Global has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Aptiv PLC's net margin of -14.49%. Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 16.76% beat Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.53%.

Aptiv PLC has a consensus price target of $80.43, signalling upside risk potential of 47.79%. On the other hand Mobileye Global has an analysts' consensus of $19.98 which suggests that it could grow by 31.99%. Given that Aptiv PLC has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe Aptiv PLC is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aptiv PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mobileye Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aptiv PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mobileye Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Mobileye Global quarterly revenues of $490M. Aptiv PLC's net income of $268M is higher than Mobileye Global's net income of -$71M. Notably, Aptiv PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Mobileye Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aptiv PLC is 0.71x versus 7.40x for Mobileye Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Modine Manufacturing has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Aptiv PLC's net margin of 6.65%. Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 16.76% beat Modine Manufacturing's return on equity of 19.94%.

Aptiv PLC has a consensus price target of $80.43, signalling upside risk potential of 47.79%. On the other hand Modine Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $144.85 which suggests that it could grow by 73.35%. Given that Modine Manufacturing has higher upside potential than Aptiv PLC, analysts believe Modine Manufacturing is more attractive than Aptiv PLC.

Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Modine Manufacturing has a beta of 2.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.879%.

Aptiv PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Modine Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aptiv PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Modine Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Modine Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $616.8M. Aptiv PLC's net income of $268M is higher than Modine Manufacturing's net income of $41M. Notably, Aptiv PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Modine Manufacturing's PE ratio is 28.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aptiv PLC is 0.71x versus 1.77x for Modine Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Aptiv PLC's net margin of 9.17%. Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 16.76% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Aptiv PLC has a consensus price target of $80.43, signalling upside risk potential of 47.79%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $314.46 which suggests that it could grow by 15.83%. Given that Aptiv PLC has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Aptiv PLC is more attractive than Tesla.

Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Aptiv PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aptiv PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Aptiv PLC's net income of $268M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Aptiv PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Tesla's PE ratio is 133.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aptiv PLC is 0.71x versus 9.74x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.