GTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Columbia Sportswear Co. has a net margin of 8.54% compared to Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net margin of 5.51%. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Columbia Sportswear Co.'s return on equity of 10.87%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Columbia Sportswear Co. has an analysts' consensus of $57.57 which suggests that it could grow by 5.62%. Given that Garrett Motion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear Co., analysts believe Garrett Motion, Inc. is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear Co..

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.227, which suggesting that the stock is 77.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Sportswear Co. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.058%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.55%. Columbia Sportswear Co. offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays 4.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear Co. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $902M, which are smaller than Columbia Sportswear Co. quarterly revenues of $943.2M. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $77M is higher than Columbia Sportswear Co.'s net income of $52M. Notably, Garrett Motion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Columbia Sportswear Co.'s PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion, Inc. is 0.98x versus 0.88x for Columbia Sportswear Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crocs, Inc. has a net margin of 8.54% compared to Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net margin of 14.64%. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Crocs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1.43%. Given that Garrett Motion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Crocs, Inc., analysts believe Garrett Motion, Inc. is more attractive than Crocs, Inc..

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.227, which suggesting that the stock is 77.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs, Inc. has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.972%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.55%. Crocs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays 4.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $902M, which are smaller than Crocs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.3M. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $77M is lower than Crocs, Inc.'s net income of $145.8M. Notably, Garrett Motion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Crocs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion, Inc. is 0.98x versus 1.21x for Crocs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dana, Inc. has a net margin of 8.54% compared to Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net margin of 0.68%. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Dana, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.9%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Dana, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.14 which suggests that it could grow by 19.32%. Given that Dana, Inc. has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, Inc., analysts believe Dana, Inc. is more attractive than Garrett Motion, Inc..

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.227, which suggesting that the stock is 77.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana, Inc. has a beta of 2.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.627%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.55%. Dana, Inc. offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays 4.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Dana, Inc. pays out 118.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dana, Inc.'s is not.

Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $902M, which are smaller than Dana, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $77M is higher than Dana, Inc.'s net income of $13M. Notably, Garrett Motion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Dana, Inc.'s PE ratio is 49.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion, Inc. is 0.98x versus 0.36x for Dana, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of 8.54% compared to Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net margin of -38.63%. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 713.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, Inc., analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Garrett Motion, Inc..

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.227, which suggesting that the stock is 77.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.55%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays 4.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $902M, which are larger than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $77M is higher than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Garrett Motion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion, Inc. is 0.98x versus 0.44x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.