GTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dana has a net margin of 11.85% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of -3.43%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Dana's return on equity of -3.27%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand Dana has an analysts' consensus of $20.14 which suggests that it could grow by 53.06%. Given that Dana has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, analysts believe Dana is more attractive than Garrett Motion.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana has a beta of 2.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.226%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Dana offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dana pays out -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $844M, which are smaller than Dana quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Garrett Motion's net income of $100M is higher than Dana's net income of -$80M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.44x while Dana's PE ratio is 147.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.53x versus 0.19x for Dana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 11.85% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of --. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.84%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $844M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Garrett Motion's net income of $100M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.44x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.53x versus 127.45x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OmniTek Engineering has a net margin of 11.85% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of -11.84%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat OmniTek Engineering's return on equity of --.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand OmniTek Engineering has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3919.29%. Given that OmniTek Engineering has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, analysts believe OmniTek Engineering is more attractive than Garrett Motion.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OmniTek Engineering has a beta of -0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.927%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. OmniTek Engineering offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OmniTek Engineering pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $844M, which are larger than OmniTek Engineering quarterly revenues of $277.4K. Garrett Motion's net income of $100M is higher than OmniTek Engineering's net income of -$32.8K. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.44x while OmniTek Engineering's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.53x versus 0.61x for OmniTek Engineering. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 11.85% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of 12.99%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Visteon's return on equity of 22.69%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $107.54 which suggests that it could grow by 37.25%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Visteon.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.508%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $844M, which are smaller than Visteon quarterly revenues of $939M. Garrett Motion's net income of $100M is lower than Visteon's net income of $122M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.44x while Visteon's PE ratio is 7.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.53x versus 0.57x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.