GTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aptiv Plc has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net margin of -6.75%. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Aptiv Plc's return on equity of 3.28%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.29%. On the other hand Aptiv Plc has an analysts' consensus of $101.25 which suggests that it could grow by 27.25%. Given that Aptiv Plc has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, Inc., analysts believe Aptiv Plc is more attractive than Garrett Motion, Inc..

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.330, which suggesting that the stock is 66.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aptiv Plc has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.192%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Aptiv Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays 13.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Aptiv Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $891M, which are smaller than Aptiv Plc quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $84M is higher than Aptiv Plc's net income of -$352M. Notably, Garrett Motion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.36x while Aptiv Plc's PE ratio is 63.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion, Inc. is 1.07x versus 0.89x for Aptiv Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net margin of -6.75%. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat BorgWarner, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.69%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.29%. On the other hand BorgWarner, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $68.85 which suggests that it could grow by 16.85%. Given that BorgWarner, Inc. has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, Inc., analysts believe BorgWarner, Inc. is more attractive than Garrett Motion, Inc..

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.330, which suggesting that the stock is 66.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner, Inc. has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.689%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. BorgWarner, Inc. offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays 13.14% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner, Inc. pays out 43.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $891M, which are smaller than BorgWarner, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $84M is higher than BorgWarner, Inc.'s net income of -$241M. Notably, Garrett Motion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.36x while BorgWarner, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion, Inc. is 1.07x versus 0.88x for BorgWarner, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dana, Inc. has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net margin of 0.68%. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Dana, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.9%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.29%. On the other hand Dana, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.43 which suggests that it could grow by 9.22%. Given that Garrett Motion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dana, Inc., analysts believe Garrett Motion, Inc. is more attractive than Dana, Inc..

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.330, which suggesting that the stock is 66.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana, Inc. has a beta of 2.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.705%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Dana, Inc. offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays 13.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Dana, Inc. pays out 118.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dana, Inc.'s is not.

Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $891M, which are smaller than Dana, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $84M is higher than Dana, Inc.'s net income of $13M. Notably, Garrett Motion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.36x while Dana, Inc.'s PE ratio is 77.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion, Inc. is 1.07x versus 0.57x for Dana, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omnitek Engineering Corp. has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net margin of 47.81%. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Omnitek Engineering Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.29%. On the other hand Omnitek Engineering Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7521.95%. Given that Omnitek Engineering Corp. has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, Inc., analysts believe Omnitek Engineering Corp. is more attractive than Garrett Motion, Inc..

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.330, which suggesting that the stock is 66.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omnitek Engineering Corp. has a beta of 0.245, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.547%.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Omnitek Engineering Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays 13.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Omnitek Engineering Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $891M, which are larger than Omnitek Engineering Corp. quarterly revenues of $296.6K. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $84M is higher than Omnitek Engineering Corp.'s net income of $141.8K. Notably, Garrett Motion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.36x while Omnitek Engineering Corp.'s PE ratio is 1.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion, Inc. is 1.07x versus 0.24x for Omnitek Engineering Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.