TGSGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archer Ltd. has a net margin of 14.61% compared to TGS ASA's net margin of 1.77%. TGS ASA's return on equity of 2.39% beat Archer Ltd.'s return on equity of -18.64%.

TGS ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Archer Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TGS ASA has higher upside potential than Archer Ltd., analysts believe TGS ASA is more attractive than Archer Ltd..

TGS ASA has a beta of 0.336, which suggesting that the stock is 66.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archer Ltd. has a beta of 0.438, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.195%.

TGS ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.95%. Archer Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. TGS ASA pays 64.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Archer Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TGS ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TGS ASA quarterly revenues are $424.1M, which are larger than Archer Ltd. quarterly revenues of $339.3M. TGS ASA's net income of $62M is higher than Archer Ltd.'s net income of $6M. Notably, TGS ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.78x while Archer Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TGS ASA is 1.01x versus 0.13x for Archer Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DNO ASA has a net margin of 14.61% compared to TGS ASA's net margin of 1.66%. TGS ASA's return on equity of 2.39% beat DNO ASA's return on equity of -9.37%.

TGS ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DNO ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TGS ASA has higher upside potential than DNO ASA, analysts believe TGS ASA is more attractive than DNO ASA.

TGS ASA has a beta of 0.336, which suggesting that the stock is 66.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DNO ASA has a beta of 0.055, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.497%.

TGS ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.95%. DNO ASA offers a yield of 9.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. TGS ASA pays 64.6% of its earnings as a dividend. DNO ASA pays out 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend. TGS ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but DNO ASA's is not.

TGS ASA quarterly revenues are $424.1M, which are smaller than DNO ASA quarterly revenues of $546.8M. TGS ASA's net income of $62M is higher than DNO ASA's net income of $9.1M. Notably, TGS ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.78x while DNO ASA's PE ratio is 12.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TGS ASA is 1.01x versus 1.21x for DNO ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Equinor ASA has a net margin of 14.61% compared to TGS ASA's net margin of -0.78%. TGS ASA's return on equity of 2.39% beat Equinor ASA's return on equity of 13.31%.

TGS ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Equinor ASA has an analysts' consensus of $23.75 which suggests that it could grow by 3.08%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than TGS ASA, analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than TGS ASA.

TGS ASA has a beta of 0.336, which suggesting that the stock is 66.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.961%.

TGS ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.95%. Equinor ASA offers a yield of 6.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. TGS ASA pays 64.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA pays out 36.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TGS ASA quarterly revenues are $424.1M, which are smaller than Equinor ASA quarterly revenues of $26B. TGS ASA's net income of $62M is higher than Equinor ASA's net income of -$203.9M. Notably, TGS ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.78x while Equinor ASA's PE ratio is 10.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TGS ASA is 1.01x versus 0.57x for Equinor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Panoro Energy ASA has a net margin of 14.61% compared to TGS ASA's net margin of -4.82%. TGS ASA's return on equity of 2.39% beat Panoro Energy ASA's return on equity of 12.42%.

TGS ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Panoro Energy ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TGS ASA has higher upside potential than Panoro Energy ASA, analysts believe TGS ASA is more attractive than Panoro Energy ASA.

TGS ASA has a beta of 0.336, which suggesting that the stock is 66.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Panoro Energy ASA has a beta of 0.087, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.265%.

TGS ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.95%. Panoro Energy ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. TGS ASA pays 64.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Panoro Energy ASA pays out 34.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TGS ASA quarterly revenues are $424.1M, which are larger than Panoro Energy ASA quarterly revenues of $63.5M. TGS ASA's net income of $62M is higher than Panoro Energy ASA's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, TGS ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.78x while Panoro Energy ASA's PE ratio is 6.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TGS ASA is 1.01x versus 0.79x for Panoro Energy ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.