EQNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron Corp. has a net margin of -0.78% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 7.49%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 13.31% beat Chevron Corp.'s return on equity of 8.03%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $23.75, signalling upside risk potential of 4.08%. On the other hand Chevron Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $172.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.64%. Given that Chevron Corp. has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Chevron Corp. is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron Corp. has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.749%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Chevron Corp. offers a yield of 4.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Equinor ASA pays 36.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron Corp. pays out 67.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26B, which are smaller than Chevron Corp. quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Equinor ASA's net income of -$203.9M is lower than Chevron Corp.'s net income of $3.6B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.84x while Chevron Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.57x versus 1.42x for Chevron Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eni SpA has a net margin of -0.78% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 4.28%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 13.31% beat Eni SpA's return on equity of 5.4%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $23.75, signalling upside risk potential of 4.08%. On the other hand Eni SpA has an analysts' consensus of $39.36 which suggests that it could grow by 5.65%. Given that Eni SpA has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Eni SpA is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eni SpA has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.729%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Eni SpA offers a yield of 6.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Equinor ASA pays 36.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Eni SpA pays out 88.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26B, which are larger than Eni SpA quarterly revenues of $23.6B. Equinor ASA's net income of -$203.9M is lower than Eni SpA's net income of $1B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.84x while Eni SpA's PE ratio is 18.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.57x versus 0.62x for Eni SpA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shell Plc has a net margin of -0.78% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 7.95%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 13.31% beat Shell Plc's return on equity of 8.22%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $23.75, signalling upside risk potential of 4.08%. On the other hand Shell Plc has an analysts' consensus of $83.04 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that Shell Plc has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Shell Plc is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shell Plc has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.189%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Shell Plc offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Equinor ASA pays 36.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell Plc pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26B, which are smaller than Shell Plc quarterly revenues of $67.7B. Equinor ASA's net income of -$203.9M is lower than Shell Plc's net income of $5.4B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.84x while Shell Plc's PE ratio is 14.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.57x versus 0.80x for Shell Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TotalEnergies SE has a net margin of -0.78% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 8.58%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 13.31% beat TotalEnergies SE's return on equity of 12.14%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $23.75, signalling upside risk potential of 4.08%. On the other hand TotalEnergies SE has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.77%. Given that TotalEnergies SE has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe TotalEnergies SE is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TotalEnergies SE has a beta of 0.188, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.222%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. TotalEnergies SE offers a yield of 5.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Equinor ASA pays 36.31% of its earnings as a dividend. TotalEnergies SE pays out 42.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26B, which are smaller than TotalEnergies SE quarterly revenues of $43.6B. Equinor ASA's net income of -$203.9M is lower than TotalEnergies SE's net income of $3.7B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.84x while TotalEnergies SE's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.57x versus 0.81x for TotalEnergies SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.