DTNOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archer Ltd. has a net margin of -9.32% compared to DNO ASA's net margin of 1.77%. DNO ASA's return on equity of -4.69% beat Archer Ltd.'s return on equity of -18.64%.

DNO ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Archer Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DNO ASA has higher upside potential than Archer Ltd., analysts believe DNO ASA is more attractive than Archer Ltd..

DNO ASA has a beta of 0.012, which suggesting that the stock is 98.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archer Ltd. has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.559%.

DNO ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.62%. Archer Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.98 per share. DNO ASA pays 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Archer Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DNO ASA quarterly revenues are $481.6M, which are larger than Archer Ltd. quarterly revenues of $339.3M. DNO ASA's net income of -$44.9M is lower than Archer Ltd.'s net income of $6M. Notably, DNO ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Archer Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DNO ASA is 1.11x versus 0.18x for Archer Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BW Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -9.32% compared to DNO ASA's net margin of 10.07%. DNO ASA's return on equity of -4.69% beat BW Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.75%.

DNO ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BW Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DNO ASA has higher upside potential than BW Energy Ltd., analysts believe DNO ASA is more attractive than BW Energy Ltd..

DNO ASA has a beta of 0.012, which suggesting that the stock is 98.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BW Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DNO ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.62%. BW Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DNO ASA pays 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend. BW Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DNO ASA quarterly revenues are $481.6M, which are larger than BW Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $199.6M. DNO ASA's net income of -$44.9M is lower than BW Energy Ltd.'s net income of $20.1M. Notably, DNO ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while BW Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DNO ASA is 1.11x versus 1.24x for BW Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Panoro Energy ASA has a net margin of -9.32% compared to DNO ASA's net margin of -4.82%. DNO ASA's return on equity of -4.69% beat Panoro Energy ASA's return on equity of 12.42%.

DNO ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Panoro Energy ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DNO ASA has higher upside potential than Panoro Energy ASA, analysts believe DNO ASA is more attractive than Panoro Energy ASA.

DNO ASA has a beta of 0.012, which suggesting that the stock is 98.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Panoro Energy ASA has a beta of 0.085, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.479%.

DNO ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.62%. Panoro Energy ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. DNO ASA pays 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Panoro Energy ASA pays out 34.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Panoro Energy ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but DNO ASA's is not.

DNO ASA quarterly revenues are $481.6M, which are larger than Panoro Energy ASA quarterly revenues of $63.5M. DNO ASA's net income of -$44.9M is lower than Panoro Energy ASA's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, DNO ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Panoro Energy ASA's PE ratio is 9.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DNO ASA is 1.11x versus 1.11x for Panoro Energy ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vår Energi ASA has a net margin of -9.32% compared to DNO ASA's net margin of 6.36%. DNO ASA's return on equity of -4.69% beat Vår Energi ASA's return on equity of 288.75%.

DNO ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vår Energi ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DNO ASA has higher upside potential than Vår Energi ASA, analysts believe DNO ASA is more attractive than Vår Energi ASA.

DNO ASA has a beta of 0.012, which suggesting that the stock is 98.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vår Energi ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DNO ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.62%. Vår Energi ASA offers a yield of 16.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. DNO ASA pays 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Vår Energi ASA pays out 239.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DNO ASA quarterly revenues are $481.6M, which are smaller than Vår Energi ASA quarterly revenues of $2.1B. DNO ASA's net income of -$44.9M is lower than Vår Energi ASA's net income of $134.5M. Notably, DNO ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Vår Energi ASA's PE ratio is 17.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DNO ASA is 1.11x versus 1.21x for Vår Energi ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.