DTNOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archer Ltd. has a net margin of 1.66% compared to DNO ASA's net margin of 1.77%. DNO ASA's return on equity of -9.37% beat Archer Ltd.'s return on equity of -18.64%.

DNO ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Archer Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DNO ASA has higher upside potential than Archer Ltd., analysts believe DNO ASA is more attractive than Archer Ltd..

DNO ASA has a beta of 0.055, which suggesting that the stock is 94.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archer Ltd. has a beta of 0.438, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.195%.

DNO ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.09%. Archer Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. DNO ASA pays 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Archer Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DNO ASA quarterly revenues are $546.8M, which are larger than Archer Ltd. quarterly revenues of $339.3M. DNO ASA's net income of $9.1M is higher than Archer Ltd.'s net income of $6M. Notably, DNO ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Archer Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DNO ASA is 1.21x versus 0.13x for Archer Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BW Energy Ltd. has a net margin of 1.66% compared to DNO ASA's net margin of 10.07%. DNO ASA's return on equity of -9.37% beat BW Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.75%.

DNO ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BW Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DNO ASA has higher upside potential than BW Energy Ltd., analysts believe DNO ASA is more attractive than BW Energy Ltd..

DNO ASA has a beta of 0.055, which suggesting that the stock is 94.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BW Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DNO ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.09%. BW Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DNO ASA pays 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend. BW Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DNO ASA quarterly revenues are $546.8M, which are larger than BW Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $199.6M. DNO ASA's net income of $9.1M is lower than BW Energy Ltd.'s net income of $20.1M. Notably, DNO ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while BW Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DNO ASA is 1.21x versus 1.10x for BW Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Equinor ASA has a net margin of 1.66% compared to DNO ASA's net margin of -0.78%. DNO ASA's return on equity of -9.37% beat Equinor ASA's return on equity of 13.31%.

DNO ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Equinor ASA has an analysts' consensus of $23.75 which suggests that it could grow by 3.08%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than DNO ASA, analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than DNO ASA.

DNO ASA has a beta of 0.055, which suggesting that the stock is 94.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.961%.

DNO ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.09%. Equinor ASA offers a yield of 6.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. DNO ASA pays 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA pays out 36.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but DNO ASA's is not.

DNO ASA quarterly revenues are $546.8M, which are smaller than Equinor ASA quarterly revenues of $26B. DNO ASA's net income of $9.1M is higher than Equinor ASA's net income of -$203.9M. Notably, DNO ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Equinor ASA's PE ratio is 10.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DNO ASA is 1.21x versus 0.57x for Equinor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Panoro Energy ASA has a net margin of 1.66% compared to DNO ASA's net margin of -4.82%. DNO ASA's return on equity of -9.37% beat Panoro Energy ASA's return on equity of 12.42%.

DNO ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Panoro Energy ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DNO ASA has higher upside potential than Panoro Energy ASA, analysts believe DNO ASA is more attractive than Panoro Energy ASA.

DNO ASA has a beta of 0.055, which suggesting that the stock is 94.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Panoro Energy ASA has a beta of 0.087, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.265%.

DNO ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.09%. Panoro Energy ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. DNO ASA pays 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Panoro Energy ASA pays out 34.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Panoro Energy ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but DNO ASA's is not.

DNO ASA quarterly revenues are $546.8M, which are larger than Panoro Energy ASA quarterly revenues of $63.5M. DNO ASA's net income of $9.1M is higher than Panoro Energy ASA's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, DNO ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Panoro Energy ASA's PE ratio is 6.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DNO ASA is 1.21x versus 0.79x for Panoro Energy ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.