ARHVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BW Energy Ltd. has a net margin of 1.77% compared to Archer Ltd.'s net margin of 10.07%. Archer Ltd.'s return on equity of -18.64% beat BW Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.75%.

Archer Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BW Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer Ltd. has higher upside potential than BW Energy Ltd., analysts believe Archer Ltd. is more attractive than BW Energy Ltd..

Archer Ltd. has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.195% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BW Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Archer Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BW Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archer Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BW Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Archer Ltd. quarterly revenues are $339.3M, which are larger than BW Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $199.6M. Archer Ltd.'s net income of $6M is lower than BW Energy Ltd.'s net income of $20.1M. Notably, Archer Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BW Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer Ltd. is 0.13x versus 1.10x for BW Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DNO ASA has a net margin of 1.77% compared to Archer Ltd.'s net margin of 1.66%. Archer Ltd.'s return on equity of -18.64% beat DNO ASA's return on equity of -9.37%.

Archer Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DNO ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer Ltd. has higher upside potential than DNO ASA, analysts believe Archer Ltd. is more attractive than DNO ASA.

Archer Ltd. has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.195% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DNO ASA has a beta of 0.055, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.497%.

Archer Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DNO ASA offers a yield of 9.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Archer Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DNO ASA pays out 378.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

Archer Ltd. quarterly revenues are $339.3M, which are smaller than DNO ASA quarterly revenues of $546.8M. Archer Ltd.'s net income of $6M is lower than DNO ASA's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Archer Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DNO ASA's PE ratio is 12.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer Ltd. is 0.13x versus 1.21x for DNO ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Equinor ASA has a net margin of 1.77% compared to Archer Ltd.'s net margin of -0.78%. Archer Ltd.'s return on equity of -18.64% beat Equinor ASA's return on equity of 13.31%.

Archer Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Equinor ASA has an analysts' consensus of $23.75 which suggests that it could grow by 3.08%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than Archer Ltd., analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than Archer Ltd..

Archer Ltd. has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.195% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.961%.

Archer Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Equinor ASA offers a yield of 6.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Archer Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA pays out 36.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer Ltd. quarterly revenues are $339.3M, which are smaller than Equinor ASA quarterly revenues of $26B. Archer Ltd.'s net income of $6M is higher than Equinor ASA's net income of -$203.9M. Notably, Archer Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Equinor ASA's PE ratio is 10.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer Ltd. is 0.13x versus 0.57x for Equinor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Panoro Energy ASA has a net margin of 1.77% compared to Archer Ltd.'s net margin of -4.82%. Archer Ltd.'s return on equity of -18.64% beat Panoro Energy ASA's return on equity of 12.42%.

Archer Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Panoro Energy ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer Ltd. has higher upside potential than Panoro Energy ASA, analysts believe Archer Ltd. is more attractive than Panoro Energy ASA.

Archer Ltd. has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.195% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Panoro Energy ASA has a beta of 0.087, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.265%.

Archer Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Panoro Energy ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Archer Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Panoro Energy ASA pays out 34.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Panoro Energy ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer Ltd. quarterly revenues are $339.3M, which are larger than Panoro Energy ASA quarterly revenues of $63.5M. Archer Ltd.'s net income of $6M is higher than Panoro Energy ASA's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Archer Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Panoro Energy ASA's PE ratio is 6.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer Ltd. is 0.13x versus 0.79x for Panoro Energy ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.