Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
84
SNLAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.32
Seasonality move
:
0.12%
Day range:
$1.32 - $1.32
52-week range:
$0.93 - $1.32
Dividend yield:
5.64%
P/E ratio:
22.76x
P/S ratio:
10.84x
P/B ratio:
0.44x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
29
1-year change:
5.6%
Market cap:
$12.1B
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNLAF
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNLAF
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
$1.32 | -- | $12.1B | 22.76x | $0.06 | 5.64% | 10.84x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$13.20 | -- | $3.8B | 47.24x | $0.26 | 6.58% | 1.31x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$12.30 | -- | $35.6B | 14.40x | $0.36 | 3.91% | 3.46x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.18x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.65x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
$5.81 | -- | $8.9B | 80.35x | $0.05 | 1.76% | 6.43x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNLAF
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
1.79% | 0.875 | -- | 6.16x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | -2.040 | -- | 0.61x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 0.586 | -- | 0.56x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.708 | -- | 0.58x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
12.54% | -0.028 | -- | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNLAF
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.14% | 2.17% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -$181.1K |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -1.43% | -1.64% | -- | -- |
Sino Land Co. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SNLAF or KRYPY?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SNLAF or KRYPY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNLAF or KRYPY More Risky?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.487, which suggesting that the stock is 51.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.829%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAF or KRYPY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.64%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 6.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 128.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 207.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAF or KRYPY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.76x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 10.84x versus 1.31x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.10.84x 22.76x -- -- KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.1.31x 47.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNLAF or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SNLAF or SUHJY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNLAF or SUHJY More Risky?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.487, which suggesting that the stock is 51.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAF or SUHJY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.64%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 128.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAF or SUHJY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.76x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 10.84x versus 3.46x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.10.84x 22.76x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.3.46x 14.40x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNLAF or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SNLAF or TIACF?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNLAF or TIACF More Risky?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.487, which suggesting that the stock is 51.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.062%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAF or TIACF?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.64%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 128.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAF or TIACF?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.76x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 10.84x versus 0.65x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.10.84x 22.76x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNLAF or WARFY?
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SNLAF or WARFY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNLAF or WARFY More Risky?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.487, which suggesting that the stock is 51.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of 0.041, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.911%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAF or WARFY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.64%. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 128.15% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. pays out 46.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAF or WARFY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.76x while The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 10.84x versus 6.43x for The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNLAFSino Land Co. Ltd.10.84x 22.76x -- -- WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.6.43x 80.35x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FTAI alert for Dec 31
FTAI Aviation Ltd. [FTAI] is down 0.38% over the past day.
Sell
45
LYEL alert for Dec 31
Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. [LYEL] is down 2.63% over the past day.
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
