Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
37
SMSEY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.33
Seasonality move
:
7.75%
Day range:
$13.31 - $13.33
52-week range:
$10.68 - $20.06
Dividend yield:
3.83%
P/E ratio:
7.33x
P/S ratio:
1.08x
P/B ratio:
2.55x
Volume:
1.1K
Avg. volume:
8K
1-year change:
-17.75%
Market cap:
$3.8B
Revenue:
$3.7B
EPS (TTM):
$1.82
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMSEY
Samsonite International SA
|
$919.9M | -- | 2.74% | -- | -- |
|
AMWD
American Woodmark
|
$458.3M | $2.37 | -3.04% | 1.26% | -- |
|
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries
|
$83M | -$0.02 | -11.94% | -97.87% | -- |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
|
-- | -- | -100% | -- | -- |
|
NCL
Northann
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMSEY
Samsonite International SA
|
$13.33 | -- | $3.8B | 7.33x | $0.51 | 3.83% | 1.08x |
|
AMWD
American Woodmark
|
$80.31 | -- | $1.2B | 12.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.71x |
|
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries
|
$13.85 | -- | $121.9M | -- | $0.20 | 5.49% | 0.36x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
|
$4.13 | -- | $124.7M | 3.93x | $0.80 | 0% | 0.20x |
|
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
|
$2.73 | -- | $474.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 273.78x |
|
NCL
Northann
|
$0.26 | -- | $6M | 37.11x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.47x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMSEY
Samsonite International SA
|
-- | 2.712 | -- | -- |
|
AMWD
American Woodmark
|
29.11% | 1.079 | 27.33% | 0.92x |
|
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries
|
-- | 1.025 | -- | 1.08x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
|
30.41% | -0.783 | 94.52% | 0.95x |
|
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
|
-- | 7.100 | -- | -- |
|
NCL
Northann
|
-- | -0.523 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMSEY
Samsonite International SA
|
$520.1M | $141.6M | 16.53% | -- | 15.51% | $281.3M |
|
AMWD
American Woodmark
|
$85.7M | $43.7M | 8.23% | 11.62% | 8.38% | $1.1M |
|
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries
|
$43.8M | -$2.9M | -8.22% | -8.22% | -3.53% | $4.2M |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
|
$26.4M | $11.1M | 6.16% | 8.37% | 7.42% | -$892K |
|
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
|
-- | -$15.1M | -- | -- | -- | -$12.4M |
|
NCL
Northann
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Samsonite International SA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SMSEY or AMWD?
American Woodmark has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Samsonite International SA's net margin of 6.12%. Samsonite International SA's return on equity of -- beat American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMSEYSamsonite International SA59.26% $0.23 -- AMWDAmerican Woodmark18.94% $1.79 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SMSEY or AMWD?
Samsonite International SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Woodmark has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.33%. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Samsonite International SA, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Samsonite International SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMSEYSamsonite International SA0 0 0 AMWDAmerican Woodmark1 3 0 -
Is SMSEY or AMWD More Risky?
Samsonite International SA has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Woodmark has a beta of 1.588, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.778%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMSEY or AMWD?
Samsonite International SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.83%. American Woodmark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Samsonite International SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Woodmark pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMSEY or AMWD?
Samsonite International SA quarterly revenues are $877.7M, which are larger than American Woodmark quarterly revenues of $452.5M. Samsonite International SA's net income of $66.2M is higher than American Woodmark's net income of $27.7M. Notably, Samsonite International SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.33x while American Woodmark's PE ratio is 12.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Samsonite International SA is 1.08x versus 0.71x for American Woodmark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMSEYSamsonite International SA1.08x 7.33x $877.7M $66.2M AMWDAmerican Woodmark0.71x 12.00x $452.5M $27.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SMSEY or BSET?
Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Samsonite International SA's net margin of -8.63%. Samsonite International SA's return on equity of -- beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMSEYSamsonite International SA59.26% $0.23 -- BSETBassett Furniture Industries52.46% -$0.82 $171.7M -
What do Analysts Say About SMSEY or BSET?
Samsonite International SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.18%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Samsonite International SA, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Samsonite International SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMSEYSamsonite International SA0 0 0 BSETBassett Furniture Industries0 0 0 -
Is SMSEY or BSET More Risky?
Samsonite International SA has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.726%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMSEY or BSET?
Samsonite International SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.83%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Samsonite International SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -188.65% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMSEY or BSET?
Samsonite International SA quarterly revenues are $877.7M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Samsonite International SA's net income of $66.2M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Samsonite International SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.33x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Samsonite International SA is 1.08x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMSEYSamsonite International SA1.08x 7.33x $877.7M $66.2M BSETBassett Furniture Industries0.36x -- $83.4M -$7.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns SMSEY or CAAS?
China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Samsonite International SA's net margin of 3.35%. Samsonite International SA's return on equity of -- beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMSEYSamsonite International SA59.26% $0.23 -- CAASChina Automotive Systems16.05% $0.18 $542.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SMSEY or CAAS?
Samsonite International SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 81.6%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Samsonite International SA, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Samsonite International SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMSEYSamsonite International SA0 0 0 CAASChina Automotive Systems0 0 0 -
Is SMSEY or CAAS More Risky?
Samsonite International SA has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.319%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMSEY or CAAS?
Samsonite International SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.83%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Samsonite International SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMSEY or CAAS?
Samsonite International SA quarterly revenues are $877.7M, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Samsonite International SA's net income of $66.2M is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Samsonite International SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.33x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Samsonite International SA is 1.08x versus 0.20x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMSEYSamsonite International SA1.08x 7.33x $877.7M $66.2M CAASChina Automotive Systems0.20x 3.93x $164.2M $5.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SMSEY or HYLN?
Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Samsonite International SA's net margin of --. Samsonite International SA's return on equity of -- beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMSEYSamsonite International SA59.26% $0.23 -- HYLNHyliion Holdings-- -$0.06 -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMSEY or HYLN?
Samsonite International SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.74%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Samsonite International SA, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Samsonite International SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMSEYSamsonite International SA0 0 0 HYLNHyliion Holdings0 0 0 -
Is SMSEY or HYLN More Risky?
Samsonite International SA has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMSEY or HYLN?
Samsonite International SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.83%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Samsonite International SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMSEY or HYLN?
Samsonite International SA quarterly revenues are $877.7M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Samsonite International SA's net income of $66.2M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Samsonite International SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.33x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Samsonite International SA is 1.08x versus 273.78x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMSEYSamsonite International SA1.08x 7.33x $877.7M $66.2M HYLNHyliion Holdings273.78x -- -- -$11.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns SMSEY or NCL?
Northann has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Samsonite International SA's net margin of --. Samsonite International SA's return on equity of -- beat Northann's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMSEYSamsonite International SA59.26% $0.23 -- NCLNorthann-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMSEY or NCL?
Samsonite International SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Samsonite International SA has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Samsonite International SA is more attractive than Northann.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMSEYSamsonite International SA0 0 0 NCLNorthann0 0 0 -
Is SMSEY or NCL More Risky?
Samsonite International SA has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMSEY or NCL?
Samsonite International SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.83%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Samsonite International SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMSEY or NCL?
Samsonite International SA quarterly revenues are $877.7M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Samsonite International SA's net income of $66.2M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Samsonite International SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.33x while Northann's PE ratio is 37.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Samsonite International SA is 1.08x versus 0.47x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMSEYSamsonite International SA1.08x 7.33x $877.7M $66.2M NCLNorthann0.47x 37.11x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
