Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
74
SFHLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.27
Seasonality move
:
-18.36%
Day range:
$18.27 - $18.27
52-week range:
$16.45 - $19.50
Dividend yield:
10.26%
P/E ratio:
13.50x
P/S ratio:
0.43x
P/B ratio:
1.48x
Volume:
200
Avg. volume:
50
1-year change:
-6.32%
Market cap:
$829.3M
Revenue:
$2B
EPS (TTM):
$1.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SFHLF
SAF-HOLLAND SE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BMWKY
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JMIA
Jumia Technologies AG
|
$49.7M | -- | 34.16% | -65.17% | $14.70 |
|
LUXE
LuxExperience BV
|
$670.2M | -$0.29 | 227.31% | -17.48% | $10.19 |
|
VWAGY
Volkswagen AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SFHLF
SAF-HOLLAND SE
|
$18.27 | -- | $829.3M | 13.50x | $0.95 | 10.26% | 0.43x |
|
BMWKY
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
|
$36.43 | -- | $67.1B | 8.69x | $1.58 | 4.34% | 0.45x |
|
JMIA
Jumia Technologies AG
|
$11.95 | $14.70 | $1.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.98x |
|
LUXE
LuxExperience BV
|
$8.46 | $10.19 | $1.2B | 1.94x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.51x |
|
VWAGY
Volkswagen AG
|
$12.18 | -- | $61.1B | 8.52x | $0.71 | 5.85% | 0.17x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SFHLF
SAF-HOLLAND SE
|
65.11% | 0.344 | 128% | 1.29x |
|
BMWKY
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
|
53.58% | 0.131 | 197.46% | 0.72x |
|
JMIA
Jumia Technologies AG
|
26.09% | 4.956 | 0.88% | 0.98x |
|
LUXE
LuxExperience BV
|
14.38% | 1.862 | 21.58% | 0.78x |
|
VWAGY
Volkswagen AG
|
61.62% | -0.006 | 442.53% | 0.68x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SFHLF
SAF-HOLLAND SE
|
$105.4M | $37.8M | 4.27% | 11.11% | 7.75% | $40.3M |
|
BMWKY
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
|
$5.4B | $2.4B | 3.56% | 7.56% | 6.32% | -$913.5M |
|
JMIA
Jumia Technologies AG
|
$21.8M | -$18.1M | -87.39% | -102.57% | -39.76% | -$13.2M |
|
LUXE
LuxExperience BV
|
$279.4M | -$81.2M | 53.25% | 62.33% | -12.12% | -$177.5M |
|
VWAGY
Volkswagen AG
|
$16.9B | $7B | 1.35% | 3.26% | 7.51% | $1.3B |
SAF-HOLLAND SE vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SFHLF or BMWKY?
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG has a net margin of 3.34% compared to SAF-HOLLAND SE's net margin of 5.25%. SAF-HOLLAND SE's return on equity of 11.11% beat Bayerische Motoren Werke AG's return on equity of 7.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE21.63% $0.36 $1.6B BMWKYBayerische Motoren Werke AG14.24% $1.07 $238.9B -
What do Analysts Say About SFHLF or BMWKY?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bayerische Motoren Werke AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SAF-HOLLAND SE has higher upside potential than Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, analysts believe SAF-HOLLAND SE is more attractive than Bayerische Motoren Werke AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE0 0 0 BMWKYBayerische Motoren Werke AG0 0 0 -
Is SFHLF or BMWKY More Risky?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.3% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bayerische Motoren Werke AG has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.281%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SFHLF or BMWKY?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.26%. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. SAF-HOLLAND SE pays 49.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SAF-HOLLAND SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SFHLF or BMWKY?
SAF-HOLLAND SE quarterly revenues are $487.6M, which are smaller than Bayerische Motoren Werke AG quarterly revenues of $37.8B. SAF-HOLLAND SE's net income of $16.3M is lower than Bayerische Motoren Werke AG's net income of $2B. Notably, SAF-HOLLAND SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.50x while Bayerische Motoren Werke AG's PE ratio is 8.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SAF-HOLLAND SE is 0.43x versus 0.45x for Bayerische Motoren Werke AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE0.43x 13.50x $487.6M $16.3M BMWKYBayerische Motoren Werke AG0.45x 8.69x $37.8B $2B
-
Which has Higher Returns SFHLF or JMIA?
Jumia Technologies AG has a net margin of 3.34% compared to SAF-HOLLAND SE's net margin of -39.31%. SAF-HOLLAND SE's return on equity of 11.11% beat Jumia Technologies AG's return on equity of -102.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE21.63% $0.36 $1.6B JMIAJumia Technologies AG47.91% -- $47.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SFHLF or JMIA?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jumia Technologies AG has an analysts' consensus of $14.70 which suggests that it could grow by 23.02%. Given that Jumia Technologies AG has higher upside potential than SAF-HOLLAND SE, analysts believe Jumia Technologies AG is more attractive than SAF-HOLLAND SE.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE0 0 0 JMIAJumia Technologies AG2 0 1 -
Is SFHLF or JMIA More Risky?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.3% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jumia Technologies AG has a beta of 2.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.405%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SFHLF or JMIA?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.26%. Jumia Technologies AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SAF-HOLLAND SE pays 49.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Jumia Technologies AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SAF-HOLLAND SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SFHLF or JMIA?
SAF-HOLLAND SE quarterly revenues are $487.6M, which are larger than Jumia Technologies AG quarterly revenues of $45.4M. SAF-HOLLAND SE's net income of $16.3M is higher than Jumia Technologies AG's net income of -$17.9M. Notably, SAF-HOLLAND SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.50x while Jumia Technologies AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SAF-HOLLAND SE is 0.43x versus 6.98x for Jumia Technologies AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE0.43x 13.50x $487.6M $16.3M JMIAJumia Technologies AG6.98x -- $45.4M -$17.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SFHLF or LUXE?
LuxExperience BV has a net margin of 3.34% compared to SAF-HOLLAND SE's net margin of -14.88%. SAF-HOLLAND SE's return on equity of 11.11% beat LuxExperience BV's return on equity of 62.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE21.63% $0.36 $1.6B LUXELuxExperience BV41.7% -$0.82 $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About SFHLF or LUXE?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LuxExperience BV has an analysts' consensus of $10.19 which suggests that it could grow by 20.45%. Given that LuxExperience BV has higher upside potential than SAF-HOLLAND SE, analysts believe LuxExperience BV is more attractive than SAF-HOLLAND SE.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE0 0 0 LUXELuxExperience BV2 3 0 -
Is SFHLF or LUXE More Risky?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.3% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LuxExperience BV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SFHLF or LUXE?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.26%. LuxExperience BV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SAF-HOLLAND SE pays 49.88% of its earnings as a dividend. LuxExperience BV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SAF-HOLLAND SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SFHLF or LUXE?
SAF-HOLLAND SE quarterly revenues are $487.6M, which are smaller than LuxExperience BV quarterly revenues of $670.2M. SAF-HOLLAND SE's net income of $16.3M is higher than LuxExperience BV's net income of -$99.7M. Notably, SAF-HOLLAND SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.50x while LuxExperience BV's PE ratio is 1.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SAF-HOLLAND SE is 0.43x versus 0.51x for LuxExperience BV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE0.43x 13.50x $487.6M $16.3M LUXELuxExperience BV0.51x 1.94x $670.2M -$99.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SFHLF or VWAGY?
Volkswagen AG has a net margin of 3.34% compared to SAF-HOLLAND SE's net margin of -1.55%. SAF-HOLLAND SE's return on equity of 11.11% beat Volkswagen AG's return on equity of 3.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE21.63% $0.36 $1.6B VWAGYVolkswagen AG18.02% -$0.11 $534.6B -
What do Analysts Say About SFHLF or VWAGY?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Volkswagen AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SAF-HOLLAND SE has higher upside potential than Volkswagen AG, analysts believe SAF-HOLLAND SE is more attractive than Volkswagen AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE0 0 0 VWAGYVolkswagen AG0 0 0 -
Is SFHLF or VWAGY More Risky?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.3% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volkswagen AG has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.674%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SFHLF or VWAGY?
SAF-HOLLAND SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.26%. Volkswagen AG offers a yield of 5.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. SAF-HOLLAND SE pays 49.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Volkswagen AG pays out 19.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SFHLF or VWAGY?
SAF-HOLLAND SE quarterly revenues are $487.6M, which are smaller than Volkswagen AG quarterly revenues of $93.8B. SAF-HOLLAND SE's net income of $16.3M is higher than Volkswagen AG's net income of -$1.5B. Notably, SAF-HOLLAND SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.50x while Volkswagen AG's PE ratio is 8.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SAF-HOLLAND SE is 0.43x versus 0.17x for Volkswagen AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SFHLFSAF-HOLLAND SE0.43x 13.50x $487.6M $16.3M VWAGYVolkswagen AG0.17x 8.52x $93.8B -$1.5B
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.
