LUXE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Continental AG has a net margin of -14.88% compared to LuxExperience BV's net margin of -18.99%. LuxExperience BV's return on equity of 62.33% beat Continental AG's return on equity of -0.59%.

LuxExperience BV has a consensus price target of $9.93, signalling upside risk potential of 2.05%. On the other hand Continental AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LuxExperience BV has higher upside potential than Continental AG, analysts believe LuxExperience BV is more attractive than Continental AG.

LuxExperience BV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Continental AG has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.111%.

LuxExperience BV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Continental AG offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. LuxExperience BV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Continental AG pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Continental AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LuxExperience BV quarterly revenues are $670.2M, which are smaller than Continental AG quarterly revenues of $5.8B. LuxExperience BV's net income of -$99.7M is higher than Continental AG's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, LuxExperience BV's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.24x while Continental AG's PE ratio is 70.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LuxExperience BV is 0.58x versus 0.57x for Continental AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jumia Technologies AG has a net margin of -14.88% compared to LuxExperience BV's net margin of -39.31%. LuxExperience BV's return on equity of 62.33% beat Jumia Technologies AG's return on equity of -102.57%.

LuxExperience BV has a consensus price target of $9.93, signalling upside risk potential of 2.05%. On the other hand Jumia Technologies AG has an analysts' consensus of $13.43 which suggests that it could grow by 16.58%. Given that Jumia Technologies AG has higher upside potential than LuxExperience BV, analysts believe Jumia Technologies AG is more attractive than LuxExperience BV.

LuxExperience BV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jumia Technologies AG has a beta of 2.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.405%.

LuxExperience BV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jumia Technologies AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LuxExperience BV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jumia Technologies AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LuxExperience BV quarterly revenues are $670.2M, which are larger than Jumia Technologies AG quarterly revenues of $45.4M. LuxExperience BV's net income of -$99.7M is lower than Jumia Technologies AG's net income of -$17.9M. Notably, LuxExperience BV's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.24x while Jumia Technologies AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LuxExperience BV is 0.58x versus 6.75x for Jumia Technologies AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volkswagen AG has a net margin of -14.88% compared to LuxExperience BV's net margin of -1.55%. LuxExperience BV's return on equity of 62.33% beat Volkswagen AG's return on equity of 3.26%.

LuxExperience BV has a consensus price target of $9.93, signalling upside risk potential of 2.05%. On the other hand Volkswagen AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LuxExperience BV has higher upside potential than Volkswagen AG, analysts believe LuxExperience BV is more attractive than Volkswagen AG.

LuxExperience BV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volkswagen AG has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.674%.

LuxExperience BV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Volkswagen AG offers a yield of 5.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. LuxExperience BV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volkswagen AG pays out 19.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Volkswagen AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LuxExperience BV quarterly revenues are $670.2M, which are smaller than Volkswagen AG quarterly revenues of $93.8B. LuxExperience BV's net income of -$99.7M is higher than Volkswagen AG's net income of -$1.5B. Notably, LuxExperience BV's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.24x while Volkswagen AG's PE ratio is 8.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LuxExperience BV is 0.58x versus 0.17x for Volkswagen AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.