SFBQF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CTW Cayman has a net margin of 16.71% compared to SoftBank Corp.'s net margin of --. SoftBank Corp.'s return on equity of 17.16% beat CTW Cayman's return on equity of --.

SoftBank Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CTW Cayman has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SoftBank Corp. has higher upside potential than CTW Cayman, analysts believe SoftBank Corp. is more attractive than CTW Cayman.

SoftBank Corp. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CTW Cayman has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SoftBank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. CTW Cayman offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SoftBank Corp. pays 78.24% of its earnings as a dividend. CTW Cayman pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoftBank Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SoftBank Corp. quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than CTW Cayman quarterly revenues of --. SoftBank Corp.'s net income of $2B is higher than CTW Cayman's net income of --. Notably, SoftBank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while CTW Cayman's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SoftBank Corp. is 1.45x versus -- for CTW Cayman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a net margin of 16.71% compared to SoftBank Corp.'s net margin of 7.43%. SoftBank Corp.'s return on equity of 17.16% beat Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9%.

SoftBank Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SoftBank Corp. has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc., analysts believe SoftBank Corp. is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc..

SoftBank Corp. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.572%.

SoftBank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. SoftBank Corp. pays 78.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays out 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SoftBank Corp. quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $577M. SoftBank Corp.'s net income of $2B is higher than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M. Notably, SoftBank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SoftBank Corp. is 1.45x versus 1.44x for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a net margin of 16.71% compared to SoftBank Corp.'s net margin of --. SoftBank Corp.'s return on equity of 17.16% beat PicoCELA, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

SoftBank Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SoftBank Corp. has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, Inc., analysts believe SoftBank Corp. is more attractive than PicoCELA, Inc..

SoftBank Corp. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SoftBank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. PicoCELA, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SoftBank Corp. pays 78.24% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoftBank Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SoftBank Corp. quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than PicoCELA, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. SoftBank Corp.'s net income of $2B is higher than PicoCELA, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, SoftBank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while PicoCELA, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SoftBank Corp. is 1.45x versus 6.68x for PicoCELA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.