PCLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CTW Cayman has a net margin of -- compared to PicoCELA, Inc.'s net margin of --. PicoCELA, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat CTW Cayman's return on equity of --.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CTW Cayman has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PicoCELA, Inc. has higher upside potential than CTW Cayman, analysts believe PicoCELA, Inc. is more attractive than CTW Cayman.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CTW Cayman has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CTW Cayman offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PicoCELA, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CTW Cayman pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PicoCELA, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CTW Cayman quarterly revenues of --. PicoCELA, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than CTW Cayman's net income of --. Notably, PicoCELA, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CTW Cayman's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PicoCELA, Inc. is 6.68x versus -- for CTW Cayman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to PicoCELA, Inc.'s net margin of 7.43%. PicoCELA, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9%.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PicoCELA, Inc. has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc., analysts believe PicoCELA, Inc. is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc..

PicoCELA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.572%.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. PicoCELA, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. pays out 26.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PicoCELA, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $577M. PicoCELA, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s net income of $42.9M. Notably, PicoCELA, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PicoCELA, Inc. is 6.68x versus 1.48x for Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NTT, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to PicoCELA, Inc.'s net margin of 10.04%. PicoCELA, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat NTT, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.46%.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NTT, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.35%. Given that NTT, Inc. has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, Inc., analysts believe NTT, Inc. is more attractive than PicoCELA, Inc..

PicoCELA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NTT, Inc. has a beta of 0.123, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.661%.

PicoCELA, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NTT, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. PicoCELA, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NTT, Inc. pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NTT, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PicoCELA, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NTT, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.8B. PicoCELA, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than NTT, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, PicoCELA, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NTT, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PicoCELA, Inc. is 6.68x versus 0.89x for NTT, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.