RLLMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a net margin of -38.83% compared to Real Matters, Inc.'s net margin of 4.06%. Real Matters, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.03% beat Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 26.79%.

Real Matters, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -49.46%. Given that Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Real Matters, Inc., analysts believe Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Real Matters, Inc..

Real Matters, Inc. has a beta of 1.478, which suggesting that the stock is 47.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.015, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.466%.

Real Matters, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Real Matters, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Real Matters, Inc. quarterly revenues are $46M, which are larger than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.3M. Real Matters, Inc.'s net income of -$17.9M is lower than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net income of $541K. Notably, Real Matters, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 225.59x while Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Real Matters, Inc. is 1.93x versus 2.56x for Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

City Office REIT, Inc. has a net margin of -38.83% compared to Real Matters, Inc.'s net margin of -10.13%. Real Matters, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.03% beat City Office REIT, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.64%.

Real Matters, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand City Office REIT, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.13 which suggests that it could fall by -12%. Given that City Office REIT, Inc. has higher upside potential than Real Matters, Inc., analysts believe City Office REIT, Inc. is more attractive than Real Matters, Inc..

Real Matters, Inc. has a beta of 1.478, which suggesting that the stock is 47.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison City Office REIT, Inc. has a beta of 1.621, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.112%.

Real Matters, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. City Office REIT, Inc. offers a yield of 5.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Real Matters, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. City Office REIT, Inc. pays out 136.99% of its earnings as a dividend.

Real Matters, Inc. quarterly revenues are $46M, which are larger than City Office REIT, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Real Matters, Inc.'s net income of -$17.9M is lower than City Office REIT, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Real Matters, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 225.59x while City Office REIT, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Real Matters, Inc. is 1.93x versus 1.71x for City Office REIT, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -38.83% compared to Real Matters, Inc.'s net margin of 5.24%. Real Matters, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.03% beat FRP Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.97%.

Real Matters, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FRP Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Real Matters, Inc. has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Real Matters, Inc. is more attractive than FRP Holdings, Inc..

Real Matters, Inc. has a beta of 1.478, which suggesting that the stock is 47.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.827%.

Real Matters, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FRP Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Real Matters, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Real Matters, Inc. quarterly revenues are $46M, which are larger than FRP Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.8M. Real Matters, Inc.'s net income of -$17.9M is lower than FRP Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $565K. Notably, Real Matters, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 225.59x while FRP Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 96.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Real Matters, Inc. is 1.93x versus 10.50x for FRP Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a net margin of -38.83% compared to Real Matters, Inc.'s net margin of -123.74%. Real Matters, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.03% beat Safe & Green Development Corp.'s return on equity of -826.7%.

Real Matters, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Safe & Green Development Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Real Matters, Inc. has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development Corp., analysts believe Real Matters, Inc. is more attractive than Safe & Green Development Corp..

Real Matters, Inc. has a beta of 1.478, which suggesting that the stock is 47.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Real Matters, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Development Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Real Matters, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Real Matters, Inc. quarterly revenues are $46M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Real Matters, Inc.'s net income of -$17.9M is lower than Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Real Matters, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 225.59x while Safe & Green Development Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Real Matters, Inc. is 1.93x versus 0.15x for Safe & Green Development Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.