CHCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eXp World Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 0.27%. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 26.79% beat eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.35%.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -49.13%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.91%. Given that eXp World Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc., analysts believe eXp World Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc..

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 101.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.978, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.833%.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings, Inc. pays out 179.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net income of $541K is lower than eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.5M. Notably, Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. is 2.54x versus 0.37x for eXp World Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 5.24%. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 26.79% beat FRP Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.97%.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -49.13%. On the other hand FRP Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. is more attractive than FRP Holdings, Inc..

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 101.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.827%.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FRP Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are larger than FRP Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.8M. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net income of $541K is lower than FRP Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $565K. Notably, Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while FRP Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 95.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. is 2.54x versus 10.37x for FRP Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The RMR Group, Inc. has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 4.7%. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 26.79% beat The RMR Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.26%.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -49.13%. On the other hand The RMR Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.54%. Given that The RMR Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc., analysts believe The RMR Group, Inc. is more attractive than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc..

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 101.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The RMR Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.146%.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The RMR Group, Inc. offers a yield of 11.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The RMR Group, Inc. pays out 174.22% of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than The RMR Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $159.4M. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net income of $541K is lower than The RMR Group, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M. Notably, Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while The RMR Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. is 2.54x versus 0.37x for The RMR Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net margin of -123.74%. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 26.79% beat Safe & Green Development Corp.'s return on equity of -826.7%.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -49.13%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development Corp., analysts believe Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Safe & Green Development Corp..

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.015, which suggesting that the stock is 101.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Development Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net income of $541K is higher than Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Safe & Green Development Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. is 2.54x versus 0.54x for Safe & Green Development Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.