SGD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a net margin of -123.74% compared to Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net margin of 4.06%. Safe & Green Development Corp.'s return on equity of -826.7% beat Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 26.79%.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -49.13%. Given that Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development Corp., analysts believe Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Safe & Green Development Corp..

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.015, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.466%.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safe & Green Development Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Development Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.5M, which are smaller than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.3M. Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net income of $541K. Notably, Safe & Green Development Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Development Corp. is 0.54x versus 2.54x for Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eXp World Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -123.74% compared to Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net margin of 0.27%. Safe & Green Development Corp.'s return on equity of -826.7% beat eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.35%.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand eXp World Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.91%. Given that eXp World Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development Corp., analysts believe eXp World Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Safe & Green Development Corp..

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.978, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.833%.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Safe & Green Development Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings, Inc. pays out 179.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Development Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.5M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.5M. Notably, Safe & Green Development Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Development Corp. is 0.54x versus 0.37x for eXp World Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -123.74% compared to Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net margin of 5.24%. Safe & Green Development Corp.'s return on equity of -826.7% beat FRP Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.97%.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FRP Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Safe & Green Development Corp. has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Safe & Green Development Corp. is more attractive than FRP Holdings, Inc..

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.827%.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FRP Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safe & Green Development Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Development Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.5M, which are smaller than FRP Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.8M. Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than FRP Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $565K. Notably, Safe & Green Development Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FRP Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 95.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Development Corp. is 0.54x versus 10.37x for FRP Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The RMR Group, Inc. has a net margin of -123.74% compared to Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net margin of 4.7%. Safe & Green Development Corp.'s return on equity of -826.7% beat The RMR Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.26%.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The RMR Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.54%. Given that The RMR Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development Corp., analysts believe The RMR Group, Inc. is more attractive than Safe & Green Development Corp..

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The RMR Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.146%.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The RMR Group, Inc. offers a yield of 11.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Safe & Green Development Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The RMR Group, Inc. pays out 174.22% of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Development Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.5M, which are smaller than The RMR Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $159.4M. Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than The RMR Group, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M. Notably, Safe & Green Development Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The RMR Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Development Corp. is 0.54x versus 0.37x for The RMR Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.