SGD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle has a net margin of -11997.76% compared to Safe & Green Development's net margin of -43.73%. Safe & Green Development's return on equity of -612.91% beat Crown Castle's return on equity of -149.84%.

Safe & Green Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $114.39 which suggests that it could grow by 12.68%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.215%.

Safe & Green Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 6.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. Safe & Green Development pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out -69.92% of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues are $18.2K, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.2M is higher than Crown Castle's net income of -$464M. Notably, Safe & Green Development's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Development is 5.85x versus 7.38x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthpeak Properties has a net margin of -11997.76% compared to Safe & Green Development's net margin of 6.09%. Safe & Green Development's return on equity of -612.91% beat Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03%.

Safe & Green Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Healthpeak Properties has an analysts' consensus of $23.38 which suggests that it could grow by 38.93%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.297%.

Safe & Green Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthpeak Properties offers a yield of 6.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Safe & Green Development pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthpeak Properties pays out 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues are $18.2K, which are smaller than Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues of $702.9M. Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M. Notably, Safe & Green Development's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthpeak Properties's PE ratio is 42.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Development is 5.85x versus 4.22x for Healthpeak Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Industrial Logistics Properties Trust has a net margin of -11997.76% compared to Safe & Green Development's net margin of -19.24%. Safe & Green Development's return on equity of -612.91% beat Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's return on equity of -8.95%.

Safe & Green Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Industrial Logistics Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.55%. Given that Industrial Logistics Properties Trust has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Industrial Logistics Properties Trust is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Industrial Logistics Properties Trust has a beta of 2.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.263%.

Safe & Green Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Industrial Logistics Properties Trust offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Safe & Green Development pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Industrial Logistics Properties Trust pays out -2.76% of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues are $18.2K, which are smaller than Industrial Logistics Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $111.9M. Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.2M is higher than Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's net income of -$21.5M. Notably, Safe & Green Development's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Development is 5.85x versus 0.46x for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of -11997.76% compared to Safe & Green Development's net margin of 33.23%. Safe & Green Development's return on equity of -612.91% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Safe & Green Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $254.94 which suggests that it could grow by 9.94%. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.015%.

Safe & Green Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Safe & Green Development pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues are $18.2K, which are smaller than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $664.2M. Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.2M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M. Notably, Safe & Green Development's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 30.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Development is 5.85x versus 9.32x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.