PUMSY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Continental AG has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Puma SE's net margin of 4.94%. Puma SE's return on equity of 9.7% beat Continental AG's return on equity of 7.05%.

Puma SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Continental AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puma SE has higher upside potential than Continental AG, analysts believe Puma SE is more attractive than Continental AG.

Puma SE has a beta of 1.213, which suggesting that the stock is 21.269% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Continental AG has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.339%.

Puma SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Continental AG offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Puma SE pays 40.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Continental AG pays out 25.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puma SE quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Continental AG quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Puma SE's net income of $140.6M is lower than Continental AG's net income of $534.5M. Notably, Puma SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.24x while Continental AG's PE ratio is 12.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puma SE is 0.76x versus 0.30x for Continental AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jumia Technologies AG has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Puma SE's net margin of -46.39%. Puma SE's return on equity of 9.7% beat Jumia Technologies AG's return on equity of -149.29%.

Puma SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jumia Technologies AG has an analysts' consensus of $4.97 which suggests that it could grow by 23.45%. Given that Jumia Technologies AG has higher upside potential than Puma SE, analysts believe Jumia Technologies AG is more attractive than Puma SE.

Puma SE has a beta of 1.213, which suggesting that the stock is 21.269% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jumia Technologies AG has a beta of 2.883, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 188.252%.

Puma SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Jumia Technologies AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puma SE pays 40.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Jumia Technologies AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Puma SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puma SE quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Jumia Technologies AG quarterly revenues of $36.4M. Puma SE's net income of $140.6M is higher than Jumia Technologies AG's net income of -$16.9M. Notably, Puma SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.24x while Jumia Technologies AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puma SE is 0.76x versus 2.38x for Jumia Technologies AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MYT Netherlands Parent BV has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Puma SE's net margin of -11.66%. Puma SE's return on equity of 9.7% beat MYT Netherlands Parent BV's return on equity of -8.45%.

Puma SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MYT Netherlands Parent BV has an analysts' consensus of $3.93 which suggests that it could fall by -10.73%. Given that MYT Netherlands Parent BV has higher upside potential than Puma SE, analysts believe MYT Netherlands Parent BV is more attractive than Puma SE.

Puma SE has a beta of 1.213, which suggesting that the stock is 21.269% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MYT Netherlands Parent BV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Puma SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. MYT Netherlands Parent BV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puma SE pays 40.28% of its earnings as a dividend. MYT Netherlands Parent BV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Puma SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puma SE quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than MYT Netherlands Parent BV quarterly revenues of $221.8M. Puma SE's net income of $140.6M is higher than MYT Netherlands Parent BV's net income of -$25.9M. Notably, Puma SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.24x while MYT Netherlands Parent BV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puma SE is 0.76x versus 0.66x for MYT Netherlands Parent BV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volkswagen AG has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Puma SE's net margin of 1.74%. Puma SE's return on equity of 9.7% beat Volkswagen AG's return on equity of 6.7%.

Puma SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Volkswagen AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puma SE has higher upside potential than Volkswagen AG, analysts believe Puma SE is more attractive than Volkswagen AG.

Puma SE has a beta of 1.213, which suggesting that the stock is 21.269% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volkswagen AG has a beta of 1.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.876%.

Puma SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Volkswagen AG offers a yield of 10.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Puma SE pays 40.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Volkswagen AG pays out 70.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puma SE quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Volkswagen AG quarterly revenues of $86.3B. Puma SE's net income of $140.6M is lower than Volkswagen AG's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Puma SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.24x while Volkswagen AG's PE ratio is 3.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puma SE is 0.76x versus 0.13x for Volkswagen AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.