Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
66
PIAIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.16
Seasonality move
:
2.41%
Day range:
$7.24 - $8.16
52-week range:
$4.93 - $9.81
Dividend yield:
4.42%
P/E ratio:
15.30x
P/S ratio:
0.89x
P/B ratio:
1.03x
Volume:
905
Avg. volume:
5.9K
1-year change:
36.09%
Market cap:
$146.5B
Revenue:
$147.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.53
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $13.25 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
|
$8.16 | -- | $146.5B | 15.30x | $0.13 | 4.42% | 0.89x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 18.32x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.89x |
|
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
|
$21.68 | -- | $60.3B | 6.90x | $0.53 | 6.99% | 1.29x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
$4.85 | -- | $21.2B | 4.94x | $0.19 | 9.5% | 0.44x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$5.90 | -- | $24.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.75x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$10.02 | $13.25 | $656.4M | 8.95x | $1.16 | 11.5% | 1.90x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
|
67.55% | 1.335 | 138.57% | 0.00x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | -0.478 | -- | 2.47x |
|
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
|
80.16% | 0.428 | 760.59% | 0.00x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
61.65% | 1.010 | -- | 32.62x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -8.335 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.61% | 2.419 | 1.25% | 3.52x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
|
-- | $4.7B | 5.26% | 12.12% | 2.21% | $25.2B |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | $2.4B | 1.86% | 8.76% | 58.62% | $7.5B |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.96% | 4.87% | 129.19% | -$16.2B |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$100.8M | $36M | 5.52% | 5.57% | 34.61% | $51.9M |
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or CCGDF?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $0.02 $500.6B CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or CCGDF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or CCGDF More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.249% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.104, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.386%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or CCGDF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 37.54% of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays out 49.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or CCGDF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $41.8B, which are larger than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $456.1M is higher than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.30x while China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.89x versus 0.89x for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.89x 15.30x $41.8B $456.1M CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.89x 18.32x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or CHCJY?
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of 15.45%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $0.02 $500.6B CHCJYChina CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.-- $0.68 $550B -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or CHCJY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is more attractive than China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 CHCJYChina CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or CHCJY More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.249% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.279, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.094%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or CHCJY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 37.54% of its earnings as a dividend. China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. pays out 22.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or CHCJY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $41.8B, which are larger than China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $456.1M is lower than China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.30x while China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.89x versus 1.29x for China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.89x 15.30x $41.8B $456.1M CHCJYChina CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.1.29x 6.90x $12.2B $1.9B
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or CMAKY?
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of 34.61%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $0.02 $500.6B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.-- $0.40 $236B -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or CMAKY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or CMAKY More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.249% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.744%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or CMAKY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 9.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 37.54% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or CMAKY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $41.8B, which are larger than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $456.1M is lower than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.30x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.89x versus 0.44x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.89x 15.30x $41.8B $456.1M CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0.44x 4.94x $5.1B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $0.02 $500.6B MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or MAAS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or MAAS More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.249% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.387%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or MAAS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 37.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or MAAS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $41.8B, which are larger than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $456.1M is higher than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.30x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.89x versus 2.75x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.89x 15.30x $41.8B $456.1M MAASMaase, Inc.2.75x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of 1.36%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $0.02 $500.6B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.96.99% $0.03 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or NOAH?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $13.25 which suggests that it could grow by 32.28%. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 2 0 -
Is PIAIF or NOAH More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.249% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.796, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.415%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or NOAH?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 11.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 37.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or NOAH?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $41.8B, which are larger than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $103.9M. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $456.1M is higher than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $1.4M. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.30x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.89x versus 1.90x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.89x 15.30x $41.8B $456.1M NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.1.90x 8.95x $103.9M $1.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
