OSAGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to OSRAM Licht AG's net margin of -4367.09%. OSRAM Licht AG's return on equity of -141.59% beat Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

OSRAM Licht AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.38 which suggests that it could grow by 25.29%. Given that Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has higher upside potential than OSRAM Licht AG, analysts believe Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is more attractive than OSRAM Licht AG.

OSRAM Licht AG has a beta of 0.842, which suggesting that the stock is 15.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 2.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.653%.

OSRAM Licht AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.66%. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OSRAM Licht AG pays -2.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

OSRAM Licht AG quarterly revenues are $881.9M, which are larger than Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $30.5M. OSRAM Licht AG's net income of -$45.2M is higher than Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3B. Notably, OSRAM Licht AG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OSRAM Licht AG is 4.12x versus 59.95x for Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to OSRAM Licht AG's net margin of 9.83%. OSRAM Licht AG's return on equity of -141.59% beat Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5%.

OSRAM Licht AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hayward Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.93 which suggests that it could grow by 10.78%. Given that Hayward Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than OSRAM Licht AG, analysts believe Hayward Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than OSRAM Licht AG.

OSRAM Licht AG has a beta of 0.842, which suggesting that the stock is 15.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

OSRAM Licht AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.66%. Hayward Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OSRAM Licht AG pays -2.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

OSRAM Licht AG quarterly revenues are $881.9M, which are larger than Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $244.3M. OSRAM Licht AG's net income of -$45.2M is lower than Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M. Notably, OSRAM Licht AG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OSRAM Licht AG is 4.12x versus 3.23x for Hayward Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to OSRAM Licht AG's net margin of --. OSRAM Licht AG's return on equity of -141.59% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.

OSRAM Licht AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OSRAM Licht AG has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe OSRAM Licht AG is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..

OSRAM Licht AG has a beta of 0.842, which suggesting that the stock is 15.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

OSRAM Licht AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.66%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OSRAM Licht AG pays -2.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

OSRAM Licht AG quarterly revenues are $881.9M, which are larger than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. OSRAM Licht AG's net income of -$45.2M is higher than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, OSRAM Licht AG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OSRAM Licht AG is 4.12x versus 0.80x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to OSRAM Licht AG's net margin of -43532.98%. OSRAM Licht AG's return on equity of -141.59% beat Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

OSRAM Licht AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solidion Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OSRAM Licht AG has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, Inc., analysts believe OSRAM Licht AG is more attractive than Solidion Technology, Inc..

OSRAM Licht AG has a beta of 0.842, which suggesting that the stock is 15.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

OSRAM Licht AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.66%. Solidion Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OSRAM Licht AG pays -2.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

OSRAM Licht AG quarterly revenues are $881.9M, which are larger than Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.4K. OSRAM Licht AG's net income of -$45.2M is lower than Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, OSRAM Licht AG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solidion Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OSRAM Licht AG is 4.12x versus 1,525.11x for Solidion Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.