OKCTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of 15.08% compared to Okinawa Cellular Telephone's net margin of 5.53%. Okinawa Cellular Telephone's return on equity of 12.49% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.18%.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Okinawa Cellular Telephone has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe Okinawa Cellular Telephone is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.696, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.449%.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Okinawa Cellular Telephone pays 39.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone quarterly revenues are $127.1M, which are smaller than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $505M. Okinawa Cellular Telephone's net income of $19.2M is lower than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $27.9M. Notably, Okinawa Cellular Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 25.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okinawa Cellular Telephone is 2.55x versus 1.65x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KDDI has a net margin of 15.08% compared to Okinawa Cellular Telephone's net margin of 12.74%. Okinawa Cellular Telephone's return on equity of 12.49% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.1%.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Okinawa Cellular Telephone has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Okinawa Cellular Telephone is more attractive than KDDI.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.060, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.049%.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Okinawa Cellular Telephone pays 39.6% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone quarterly revenues are $127.1M, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $8.9B. Okinawa Cellular Telephone's net income of $19.2M is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Okinawa Cellular Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while KDDI's PE ratio is 15.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okinawa Cellular Telephone is 2.55x versus 1.68x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of 15.08% compared to Okinawa Cellular Telephone's net margin of 8.46%. Okinawa Cellular Telephone's return on equity of 12.49% beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 12.71%.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.01%. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than Okinawa Cellular Telephone, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than Okinawa Cellular Telephone.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.142, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.768%.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Okinawa Cellular Telephone pays 39.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone quarterly revenues are $127.1M, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $20.8B. Okinawa Cellular Telephone's net income of $19.2M is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Okinawa Cellular Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okinawa Cellular Telephone is 2.55x versus 0.93x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 15.08% compared to Okinawa Cellular Telephone's net margin of --. Okinawa Cellular Telephone's return on equity of 12.49% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Okinawa Cellular Telephone has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Okinawa Cellular Telephone is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okinawa Cellular Telephone pays 39.6% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okinawa Cellular Telephone's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Okinawa Cellular Telephone quarterly revenues are $127.1M, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Okinawa Cellular Telephone's net income of $19.2M is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Okinawa Cellular Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okinawa Cellular Telephone is 2.55x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.