MCOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gentherm has a net margin of -196.95% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of 4.3%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Gentherm's return on equity of 10.41%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 886359104.55%. On the other hand Gentherm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 57.73%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Gentherm.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.321%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gentherm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $775K, which are smaller than Gentherm quarterly revenues of $371.5M. Micromobility com's net income of $5M is lower than Gentherm's net income of $16M. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gentherm's PE ratio is 18.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.10x versus 0.84x for Gentherm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -196.95% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of 8.61%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 886359104.55%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -32.58%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Tesla.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $775K, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Micromobility com's net income of $5M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.10x versus 15.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of -196.95% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of -86.59%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 886359104.55%. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1900%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Twin Vee PowerCats, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Twin Vee PowerCats.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $775K, which are smaller than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $2.9M. Micromobility com's net income of $5M is higher than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.10x versus 0.18x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of -196.95% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of 3.69%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of 6.39%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 886359104.55%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $65.22 which suggests that it could grow by 30.5%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Winnebago Industries, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Winnebago Industries.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.601, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.126%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $775K, which are smaller than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $786M. Micromobility com's net income of $5M is lower than Winnebago Industries's net income of $29M. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 166.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.10x versus 0.52x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.