MCOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Thor Industries has a net margin of -196.95% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of -0.03%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Thor Industries's return on equity of 5.04%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 974995025%. On the other hand Thor Industries has an analysts' consensus of $86.42 which suggests that it could grow by 19.56%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Thor Industries.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.649% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries has a beta of 1.600, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.022%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thor Industries offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries pays out 38.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $775K, which are smaller than Thor Industries quarterly revenues of $2B. Micromobility com's net income of $5M is higher than Thor Industries's net income of -$551K. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Thor Industries's PE ratio is 19.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.12x versus 0.41x for Thor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentherm has a net margin of -196.95% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of 4.34%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Gentherm's return on equity of 10.12%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 974995025%. On the other hand Gentherm has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.16%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Gentherm.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.649% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm has a beta of 1.461, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.112%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gentherm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $775K, which are smaller than Gentherm quarterly revenues of $352.9M. Micromobility com's net income of $5M is lower than Gentherm's net income of $15.3M. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gentherm's PE ratio is 11.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.12x versus 0.54x for Gentherm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -196.95% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of 2.12%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 974995025%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $291.39 which suggests that it could grow by 18.42%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Tesla.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.649% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $775K, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Micromobility com's net income of $5M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 137.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.12x versus 9.18x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of -196.95% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of -0.07%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 974995025%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $48.92 which suggests that it could grow by 53.06%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Winnebago Industries, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Winnebago Industries.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.649% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.99%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $775K, which are smaller than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $620.2M. Micromobility com's net income of $5M is higher than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.12x versus 0.34x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.