MCOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Thor Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 62.13% compared to micromobility.com, Inc.'s net margin of 0.97%. micromobility.com, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Thor Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.74%.

micromobility.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 847821747.83%. On the other hand Thor Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $113.42 which suggests that it could fall by -0.14%. Given that micromobility.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, Inc., analysts believe micromobility.com, Inc. is more attractive than Thor Industries, Inc..

micromobility.com, Inc. has a beta of -0.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.687%.

micromobility.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thor Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. micromobility.com, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries, Inc. pays out 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

micromobility.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $610K, which are smaller than Thor Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. micromobility.com, Inc.'s net income of $379K is lower than Thor Industries, Inc.'s net income of $23.2M. Notably, micromobility.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.28x while Thor Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for micromobility.com, Inc. is 0.44x versus 0.62x for Thor Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 62.13% compared to micromobility.com, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. micromobility.com, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

micromobility.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 847821747.83%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $418.44 which suggests that it could grow by 0.33%. Given that micromobility.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe micromobility.com, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

micromobility.com, Inc. has a beta of -0.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.

micromobility.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. micromobility.com, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

micromobility.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $610K, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. micromobility.com, Inc.'s net income of $379K is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, micromobility.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.28x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 387.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for micromobility.com, Inc. is 0.44x versus 15.51x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 62.13% compared to micromobility.com, Inc.'s net margin of 0.78%. micromobility.com, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.97%.

micromobility.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 847821747.83%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 6.21%. Given that micromobility.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Winnebago Industries, Inc., analysts believe micromobility.com, Inc. is more attractive than Winnebago Industries, Inc..

micromobility.com, Inc. has a beta of -0.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.248%.

micromobility.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winnebago Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. micromobility.com, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries, Inc. pays out 149.76% of its earnings as a dividend.

micromobility.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $610K, which are smaller than Winnebago Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $702.7M. micromobility.com, Inc.'s net income of $379K is lower than Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s net income of $5.5M. Notably, micromobility.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.28x while Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for micromobility.com, Inc. is 0.44x versus 0.46x for Winnebago Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.