WGO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 3.69% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of 6.27%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of 6.39% beat General Motors's return on equity of 15.22%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $65.22, signalling upside risk potential of 30.5%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $53.31 which suggests that it could grow by 14.65%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than General Motors.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.601, which suggesting that the stock is 60.126% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.238%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 5.9% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $786M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $48.8B. Winnebago Industries's net income of $29M is lower than General Motors's net income of $3.1B. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 166.60x while General Motors's PE ratio is 5.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.52x versus 0.34x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micromobility com has a net margin of 3.69% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of -196.95%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of 6.39% beat Micromobility com's return on equity of --.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $65.22, signalling upside risk potential of 30.5%. On the other hand Micromobility com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 886359104.55%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Winnebago Industries, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Winnebago Industries.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.601, which suggesting that the stock is 60.126% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micromobility com has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Micromobility com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Micromobility com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $786M, which are larger than Micromobility com quarterly revenues of $775K. Winnebago Industries's net income of $29M is higher than Micromobility com's net income of $5M. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 166.60x while Micromobility com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.52x versus 0.10x for Micromobility com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thor Industries has a net margin of 3.69% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of -0.09%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of 6.39% beat Thor Industries's return on equity of 5.25%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $65.22, signalling upside risk potential of 30.5%. On the other hand Thor Industries has an analysts' consensus of $108.45 which suggests that it could grow by 11.51%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Thor Industries.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.601, which suggesting that the stock is 60.126% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries has a beta of 1.675, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.542%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Thor Industries offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries pays out 38.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $786M, which are smaller than Thor Industries quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Winnebago Industries's net income of $29M is higher than Thor Industries's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 166.60x while Thor Industries's PE ratio is 24.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.52x versus 0.54x for Thor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 3.69% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of 8.61%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of 6.39% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $65.22, signalling upside risk potential of 30.5%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -32.58%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Tesla.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.601, which suggesting that the stock is 60.126% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $786M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Winnebago Industries's net income of $29M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 166.60x while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.52x versus 15.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.