WGO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

micromobility.com, Inc. has a net margin of 0.78% compared to Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 62.13%. Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.97% beat micromobility.com, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.42, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand micromobility.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 847821747.83%. Given that micromobility.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Winnebago Industries, Inc., analysts believe micromobility.com, Inc. is more attractive than Winnebago Industries, Inc..

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison micromobility.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.049, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.064%.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. micromobility.com, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winnebago Industries, Inc. pays 149.76% of its earnings as a dividend. micromobility.com, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $702.7M, which are larger than micromobility.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $610K. Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s net income of $5.5M is higher than micromobility.com, Inc.'s net income of $379K. Notably, Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.04x while micromobility.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries, Inc. is 0.42x versus 0.53x for micromobility.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thor Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 0.78% compared to Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 0.97%. Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.97% beat Thor Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.74%.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.42, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Thor Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $108.58 which suggests that it could grow by 2.09%. Given that Winnebago Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, Inc., analysts believe Winnebago Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Thor Industries, Inc..

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.016%.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. Thor Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Winnebago Industries, Inc. pays 149.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries, Inc. pays out 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s is not.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $702.7M, which are smaller than Thor Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s net income of $5.5M is lower than Thor Industries, Inc.'s net income of $23.2M. Notably, Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.04x while Thor Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries, Inc. is 0.42x versus 0.58x for Thor Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 0.78% compared to Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.97% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.42, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $399.15 which suggests that it could fall by -17.77%. Given that Winnebago Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Winnebago Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.22%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winnebago Industries, Inc. pays 149.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $702.7M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s net income of $5.5M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.04x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 324.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries, Inc. is 0.42x versus 17.87x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.