KPLUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FUCHS SE has a net margin of 0.25% compared to K+S AG's net margin of 9.38%. K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05% beat FUCHS SE's return on equity of 15.63%.

K+S AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FUCHS SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K+S AG has higher upside potential than FUCHS SE, analysts believe K+S AG is more attractive than FUCHS SE.

K+S AG has a beta of 0.218, which suggesting that the stock is 78.244% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FUCHS SE has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.373%.

K+S AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. FUCHS SE offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. K+S AG pays 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. FUCHS SE pays out 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. FUCHS SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but K+S AG's is not.

K+S AG quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than FUCHS SE quarterly revenues of $1B. K+S AG's net income of $2.6M is lower than FUCHS SE's net income of $98.2M. Notably, K+S AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 100.36x while FUCHS SE's PE ratio is 17.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K+S AG is 0.77x versus 1.45x for FUCHS SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a net margin of 0.25% compared to K+S AG's net margin of --. K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05% beat Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 10%.

K+S AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Heidelberg Materials AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K+S AG has higher upside potential than Heidelberg Materials AG, analysts believe K+S AG is more attractive than Heidelberg Materials AG.

K+S AG has a beta of 0.218, which suggesting that the stock is 78.244% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.741%.

K+S AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. Heidelberg Materials AG offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.69 per share. K+S AG pays 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidelberg Materials AG pays out 33.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidelberg Materials AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but K+S AG's is not.

K+S AG quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues of --. K+S AG's net income of $2.6M is higher than Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of --. Notably, K+S AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 100.36x while Heidelberg Materials AG's PE ratio is 60.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K+S AG is 0.77x versus 1.87x for Heidelberg Materials AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has a net margin of 0.25% compared to K+S AG's net margin of -29.49%. K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05% beat KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's return on equity of 10.73%.

K+S AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K+S AG has higher upside potential than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, analysts believe K+S AG is more attractive than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA.

K+S AG has a beta of 0.218, which suggesting that the stock is 78.244% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has a beta of 0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.51%.

K+S AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.46 per share. K+S AG pays 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA pays out 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but K+S AG's is not.

K+S AG quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA quarterly revenues of $213.1M. K+S AG's net income of $2.6M is higher than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's net income of -$62.9M. Notably, K+S AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 100.36x while KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's PE ratio is 53.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K+S AG is 0.77x versus 1.62x for KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SGL Carbon SE has a net margin of 0.25% compared to K+S AG's net margin of -9.87%. K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05% beat SGL Carbon SE's return on equity of -28.96%.

K+S AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGL Carbon SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K+S AG has higher upside potential than SGL Carbon SE, analysts believe K+S AG is more attractive than SGL Carbon SE.

K+S AG has a beta of 0.218, which suggesting that the stock is 78.244% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGL Carbon SE has a beta of 0.340, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.96%.

K+S AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. SGL Carbon SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K+S AG pays 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. SGL Carbon SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K+S AG quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than SGL Carbon SE quarterly revenues of $233.4M. K+S AG's net income of $2.6M is higher than SGL Carbon SE's net income of -$23M. Notably, K+S AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 100.36x while SGL Carbon SE's PE ratio is 7.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K+S AG is 0.77x versus 0.70x for SGL Carbon SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.