KPLUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heidelberg Materials AG has a net margin of 0.25% compared to K+S AG's net margin of --. K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05% beat Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 10%.

K+S AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Heidelberg Materials AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K+S AG has higher upside potential than Heidelberg Materials AG, analysts believe K+S AG is more attractive than Heidelberg Materials AG.

K+S AG has a beta of 0.193, which suggesting that the stock is 80.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.138%.

K+S AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Heidelberg Materials AG offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.69 per share. K+S AG pays 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidelberg Materials AG pays out 33.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidelberg Materials AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but K+S AG's is not.

K+S AG quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues of --. K+S AG's net income of $2.6M is higher than Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of --. Notably, K+S AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 100.36x while Heidelberg Materials AG's PE ratio is 22.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K+S AG is 0.67x versus 1.96x for Heidelberg Materials AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has a net margin of 0.25% compared to K+S AG's net margin of -4.3%. K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05% beat KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's return on equity of 9.94%.

K+S AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K+S AG has higher upside potential than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, analysts believe K+S AG is more attractive than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA.

K+S AG has a beta of 0.193, which suggesting that the stock is 80.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.11%.

K+S AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.46 per share. K+S AG pays 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA pays out 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but K+S AG's is not.

K+S AG quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA quarterly revenues of $266.7M. K+S AG's net income of $2.6M is higher than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's net income of -$11.5M. Notably, K+S AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 100.36x while KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's PE ratio is 91.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K+S AG is 0.67x versus 1.46x for KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SGL Carbon SE has a net margin of 0.25% compared to K+S AG's net margin of -9.87%. K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05% beat SGL Carbon SE's return on equity of -28.96%.

K+S AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGL Carbon SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K+S AG has higher upside potential than SGL Carbon SE, analysts believe K+S AG is more attractive than SGL Carbon SE.

K+S AG has a beta of 0.193, which suggesting that the stock is 80.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGL Carbon SE has a beta of 0.194, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.617%.

K+S AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. SGL Carbon SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K+S AG pays 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. SGL Carbon SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K+S AG quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than SGL Carbon SE quarterly revenues of $233.4M. K+S AG's net income of $2.6M is higher than SGL Carbon SE's net income of -$23M. Notably, K+S AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 100.36x while SGL Carbon SE's PE ratio is 7.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K+S AG is 0.67x versus 0.44x for SGL Carbon SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symrise AG has a net margin of 0.25% compared to K+S AG's net margin of --. K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05% beat Symrise AG's return on equity of 13.25%.

K+S AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symrise AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K+S AG has higher upside potential than Symrise AG, analysts believe K+S AG is more attractive than Symrise AG.

K+S AG has a beta of 0.193, which suggesting that the stock is 80.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symrise AG has a beta of 0.714, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.636%.

K+S AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Symrise AG offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. K+S AG pays 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Symrise AG pays out 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Symrise AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but K+S AG's is not.

K+S AG quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Symrise AG quarterly revenues of --. K+S AG's net income of $2.6M is higher than Symrise AG's net income of --. Notably, K+S AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 100.36x while Symrise AG's PE ratio is 20.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K+S AG is 0.67x versus 2.07x for Symrise AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.