Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
68
HLBZF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$254.71
Seasonality move
:
11.1%
Day range:
$254.55 - $272.65
52-week range:
$125.30 - $276.30
Dividend yield:
1.45%
P/E ratio:
22.38x
P/S ratio:
1.96x
P/B ratio:
2.38x
Volume:
163
Avg. volume:
360
1-year change:
97.83%
Market cap:
$45.4B
Revenue:
$22.9B
EPS (TTM):
$11.47
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLBZF
Heidelberg Materials AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BASFY
BASF SE
|
$17.8B | -- | 0.58% | -- | $13.23 |
|
KNKZF
KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KPLUY
K+S AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SGLFF
SGL Carbon SE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SYIEY
Symrise AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLBZF
Heidelberg Materials AG
|
$254.71 | -- | $45.4B | 22.38x | $3.69 | 1.45% | 1.96x |
|
BASFY
BASF SE
|
$12.83 | $13.23 | $45.8B | 151.30x | $0.63 | 4.91% | 0.66x |
|
KNKZF
KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA
|
$79.63 | -- | $2.6B | 91.39x | $1.46 | 1.83% | 1.46x |
|
KPLUY
K+S AG
|
$7.46 | -- | $2.7B | 100.36x | $0.08 | 1.1% | 0.67x |
|
SGLFF
SGL Carbon SE
|
$3.57 | -- | $436.9M | 7.62x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.44x |
|
SYIEY
Symrise AG
|
$20.06 | -- | $11.2B | 20.34x | $0.34 | 1.69% | 2.07x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLBZF
Heidelberg Materials AG
|
33.45% | -0.424 | -- | 0.71x |
|
BASFY
BASF SE
|
41.02% | 0.042 | 58.4% | 0.67x |
|
KNKZF
KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA
|
23.07% | 0.967 | 22.56% | 1.07x |
|
KPLUY
K+S AG
|
10.4% | 0.433 | 23.84% | 1.91x |
|
SGLFF
SGL Carbon SE
|
32.92% | 1.213 | 54.65% | 1.29x |
|
SYIEY
Symrise AG
|
37.66% | -0.727 | -- | 0.83x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLBZF
Heidelberg Materials AG
|
-- | -- | 6.98% | 10% | -- | -- |
|
BASFY
BASF SE
|
$3.7B | $552.7M | 0.58% | 0.96% | 3.3% | $398.4M |
|
KNKZF
KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA
|
-- | -$24.4M | 7.49% | 9.94% | -9.16% | -$98.5M |
|
KPLUY
K+S AG
|
$93.5M | $36M | -29.07% | -32.05% | 3.5% | $38.9M |
|
SGLFF
SGL Carbon SE
|
$57.3M | $22.7M | -20% | -28.96% | 9.72% | $68.9K |
|
SYIEY
Symrise AG
|
-- | -- | 8.27% | 13.25% | -- | -- |
Heidelberg Materials AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HLBZF or BASFY?
BASF SE has a net margin of -- compared to Heidelberg Materials AG's net margin of 1.18%. Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 10% beat BASF SE's return on equity of 0.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG-- -- $31.5B BASFYBASF SE22.06% $0.06 $66.6B -
What do Analysts Say About HLBZF or BASFY?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BASF SE has an analysts' consensus of $13.23 which suggests that it could fall by -0.43%. Given that BASF SE has higher upside potential than Heidelberg Materials AG, analysts believe BASF SE is more attractive than Heidelberg Materials AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG0 0 0 BASFYBASF SE0 0 1 -
Is HLBZF or BASFY More Risky?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BASF SE has a beta of 0.846, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.417%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLBZF or BASFY?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. BASF SE offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Heidelberg Materials AG pays 33.45% of its earnings as a dividend. BASF SE pays out 112.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidelberg Materials AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BASF SE's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLBZF or BASFY?
Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BASF SE quarterly revenues of $16.7B. Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of -- is lower than BASF SE's net income of $197.5M. Notably, Heidelberg Materials AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.38x while BASF SE's PE ratio is 151.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidelberg Materials AG is 1.96x versus 0.66x for BASF SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG1.96x 22.38x -- -- BASFYBASF SE0.66x 151.30x $16.7B $197.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLBZF or KNKZF?
KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has a net margin of -- compared to Heidelberg Materials AG's net margin of -4.3%. Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 10% beat KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's return on equity of 9.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG-- -- $31.5B KNKZFKWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA-- -$0.35 $2.4B -
What do Analysts Say About HLBZF or KNKZF?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Heidelberg Materials AG has higher upside potential than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, analysts believe Heidelberg Materials AG is more attractive than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG0 0 0 KNKZFKWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA0 0 0 -
Is HLBZF or KNKZF More Risky?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.11%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLBZF or KNKZF?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.46 per share. Heidelberg Materials AG pays 33.45% of its earnings as a dividend. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA pays out 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLBZF or KNKZF?
Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA quarterly revenues of $266.7M. Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of -- is lower than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's net income of -$11.5M. Notably, Heidelberg Materials AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.38x while KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's PE ratio is 91.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidelberg Materials AG is 1.96x versus 1.46x for KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG1.96x 22.38x -- -- KNKZFKWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA1.46x 91.39x $266.7M -$11.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLBZF or KPLUY?
K+S AG has a net margin of -- compared to Heidelberg Materials AG's net margin of 0.25%. Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 10% beat K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG-- -- $31.5B KPLUYK+S AG9.1% $0.01 $5.6B -
What do Analysts Say About HLBZF or KPLUY?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand K+S AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Heidelberg Materials AG has higher upside potential than K+S AG, analysts believe Heidelberg Materials AG is more attractive than K+S AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG0 0 0 KPLUYK+S AG0 0 0 -
Is HLBZF or KPLUY More Risky?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison K+S AG has a beta of 0.193, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.712%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLBZF or KPLUY?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. K+S AG offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Heidelberg Materials AG pays 33.45% of its earnings as a dividend. K+S AG pays out 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidelberg Materials AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but K+S AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLBZF or KPLUY?
Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than K+S AG quarterly revenues of $1B. Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of -- is lower than K+S AG's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Heidelberg Materials AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.38x while K+S AG's PE ratio is 100.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidelberg Materials AG is 1.96x versus 0.67x for K+S AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG1.96x 22.38x -- -- KPLUYK+S AG0.67x 100.36x $1B $2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLBZF or SGLFF?
SGL Carbon SE has a net margin of -- compared to Heidelberg Materials AG's net margin of -9.87%. Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 10% beat SGL Carbon SE's return on equity of -28.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG-- -- $31.5B SGLFFSGL Carbon SE24.54% -$0.19 $845.6M -
What do Analysts Say About HLBZF or SGLFF?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGL Carbon SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Heidelberg Materials AG has higher upside potential than SGL Carbon SE, analysts believe Heidelberg Materials AG is more attractive than SGL Carbon SE.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG0 0 0 SGLFFSGL Carbon SE0 0 0 -
Is HLBZF or SGLFF More Risky?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGL Carbon SE has a beta of 0.194, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.617%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLBZF or SGLFF?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. SGL Carbon SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Heidelberg Materials AG pays 33.45% of its earnings as a dividend. SGL Carbon SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heidelberg Materials AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLBZF or SGLFF?
Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SGL Carbon SE quarterly revenues of $233.4M. Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of -- is lower than SGL Carbon SE's net income of -$23M. Notably, Heidelberg Materials AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.38x while SGL Carbon SE's PE ratio is 7.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidelberg Materials AG is 1.96x versus 0.44x for SGL Carbon SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG1.96x 22.38x -- -- SGLFFSGL Carbon SE0.44x 7.62x $233.4M -$23M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLBZF or SYIEY?
Symrise AG has a net margin of -- compared to Heidelberg Materials AG's net margin of --. Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 10% beat Symrise AG's return on equity of 13.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG-- -- $31.5B SYIEYSymrise AG-- -- $7B -
What do Analysts Say About HLBZF or SYIEY?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symrise AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Heidelberg Materials AG has higher upside potential than Symrise AG, analysts believe Heidelberg Materials AG is more attractive than Symrise AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG0 0 0 SYIEYSymrise AG0 0 0 -
Is HLBZF or SYIEY More Risky?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symrise AG has a beta of 0.714, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.636%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLBZF or SYIEY?
Heidelberg Materials AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Symrise AG offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Heidelberg Materials AG pays 33.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Symrise AG pays out 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLBZF or SYIEY?
Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Symrise AG quarterly revenues of --. Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of -- is lower than Symrise AG's net income of --. Notably, Heidelberg Materials AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.38x while Symrise AG's PE ratio is 20.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidelberg Materials AG is 1.96x versus 2.07x for Symrise AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLBZFHeidelberg Materials AG1.96x 22.38x -- -- SYIEYSymrise AG2.07x 20.34x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
